IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: CLOCK_TAI (was NTPv5: big picture)

Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> Thu, 07 January 2021 09:13 UTC

Return-Path: <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF833A0C38 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 01:13:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.037
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.037 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pDMGv6NfdS8H for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 01:13:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231CE3A0C30 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 01:13:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BF0406060; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 01:13:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3
To: ntp@ietf.org
cc: hmurray@megapathdsl.net
From: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
In-Reply-To: Message from "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> of "Thu, 07 Jan 2021 09:23:08 +0100." <5FF6C4EC020000A10003E041@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 01:13:30 -0800
Message-Id: <20210107091330.11BF0406060@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/u-cbRDz38fMz9FkvwNFd_2hoF7g>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: CLOCK_TAI (was NTPv5: big picture)
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 09:13:36 -0000

Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de said:
> My initial feeling is that a NTPv5 server should respond to v3 and v4
> requests. If networks really have v2 clients or older, they'd need some
> "gateway" to translate the time. 

Requests arriving at a pool server:
    136711  0.221% NTPv1
     10626  0.017% NTPv2
  16845809 27.269% NTPv3
  44782460 72.492% NTPv4
         3  0.000% NTPv6 - length 48
         1  0.000% NTPv6 - length 68




-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email