[Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: NTPv5: big picture

Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> Mon, 04 January 2021 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA9C3A0D6F for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 06:14:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qoq_WQMp_JFA for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 06:14:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.uni-regensburg.de (mx1.uni-regensburg.de [IPv6:2001:638:a05:137:165:0:3:bdf7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6ACA3A0D6B for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 06:14:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id BA8A1600004E for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 15:14:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de (gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.5.51]) by mx1.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DF3600004D for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 15:14:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from uni-regensburg-smtp1-MTA by gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 15:14:35 +0100
Message-Id: <5FF322C9020000A10003DF28@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 18.3.0
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 15:14:33 +0100
From: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>, magnus@rubidium.se
Cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
References: <20210101055326.A54D840605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> <e7d72afa-7cff-3158-f930-81d3510100a0@rubidium.se> <ECD0A9810200004843047E14@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <7E3AA892020000B17ED719BE@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <7E3AA892020000B17ED719BE@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/NGIzmoTove8lWm_zE4ZM6FdLtUQ>
Subject: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: NTPv5: big picture
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 14:14:47 -0000

>>> Magnus Danielson <magnus@rubidium.se> schrieb am 01.01.2021 um 13:29 in
Nachricht <e7d72afa-7cff-3158-f930-81d3510100a0@rubidium.se>:

...
> 
> When on the "Internet", we should require DNS access. We should require

At least (regarding IPv6 addresses) being able to resolve a host name to an
address.
An interesing point is whether that's part of the protocol, because on-wire we
do not have host names, do we?

> boxes that have preconfigured servers to have them preconfigured as
> DNS‑entries rather than fixed IP addresses. We learned that the hard way
> (ask PHK). This is not to say it will be the right thing for all other
> scenarios we can use NTP in.

I also prefer DNS names, for documentation reasons.

When demanding DNS use, it will be interesting to specify _when_ DNS is being
used: Obviously not for each packet, but preferrably more than once in the
lifetime of the daemon.

> 
> Cheers,
> Magnus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp