IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] NTPv5: big picture

Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> Tue, 05 January 2021 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BB93A102D for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 08:31:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ybWwJsHK7C0a for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 08:31:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com (mail-pf1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C6653A13B7 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 08:30:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id x126so43099pfc.7 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 08:30:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GXBuBqTiit/KDxCKwvV59E138m5LBaBrR/gJlbid+9I=; b=iaEhZvVheovCf4I+MfBFOPrWCEydOpjXdOlU80DjkHTzVWD9OypHN2RgvS4LFjk5zd wiShoTQn3LK2TFA9xBfDz39+am/e+yTNkYBP3mGkkFAZilXW9GgNMExeLUQqsEItQfoK 1KFDaOMAxhdTaFMCYnFiznIE4iTYvAZJDn6zXRviKVxe4YY/0z2dAZaFV0Kvdny2Wdml q2XVAGy44M/yHx5E2T+9Eywg1ekQFOuMNfaso8pbiLYXU3/2rZ8DvmfwOtJF7lyn4QU8 wtJ3IUH3Gkfc7CboN8CedgPXgCZmve48fJsncaKb8iqxz36nE5yHBF9imV+ix8tzpO3s RdmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GXBuBqTiit/KDxCKwvV59E138m5LBaBrR/gJlbid+9I=; b=FEhHOLRArT/e/RN0FhxZp+u04DMdNvoQK6OZ3r/++fN/OFIcjlWHy/s0X+JLpqruIy iQE4eaCYizLw8KMnIXSW+ngCJjT3NDSD+t32ZsAiFh8cpJU+ZG7V5ZNaMau4OfWYhz6i mMQBeSVg9CfJs5lmiq9IFXAkf4lq+ED0exsem8T7FZXzRU/UrWgf0h3wy6kbvYK9qK3e osUKPviTzMIRYNfj954eZV4TcZb4lsfDC79L10qAdnfHpyOXVUF+UOMZU1AAViV2Y29V YQTf4eKk2Tm3xvRYjU7vmcnkqAVTzI2mA/puLhDBLjRv3VMzNjv6ToIzzp1i4La5dOQl 3eeg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533fCEsFzpH6rRlAGm9nEtVhh8Oass8QNo1EavIOQ9qnFkOSc3dx 30W+gyXBeQ4uBBAnroCBlCjpcspM/Qh0Chf3bMgqPAt3r94=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx0KD+FDkrcxeCMYnIH5ABELU0pFfNr7nrdhVLbGnipr+wRtM7InkYceI9MqXHitb0IiR/aAQqrP/IS3BS0GTs=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:93c3:0:b029:19d:e081:9751 with SMTP id y3-20020aa793c30000b029019de0819751mr273939pff.73.1609864233966; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 08:30:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210101025440.ECE3340605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> <CAFTY+dChQ5pX2w9tqz=ORsorfFVNCeeherrBjuRLP77iSLKCag@mail.gmail.com> <CAJm83bDheTXhwS6wEEPVe8hu-zbhy01H+3q7Wx85_3aYBYmt+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAFTY+dDVpPUQ4qX+t+knn2ivDg37LYcyn8vJ7uj6bAeBwfBXXQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFTY+dDVpPUQ4qX+t+knn2ivDg37LYcyn8vJ7uj6bAeBwfBXXQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 11:30:21 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJm83bBXujnajEKuAE35xCCTSiZyVtX_NzB_Rwvj26e=9QsWBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: James Browning <JamesB.FE80@gmail.com>
Cc: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cd5db505b829b9d3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/EJgJmchCx3Qh-DZk4N84ThIrdvQ>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] NTPv5: big picture
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 16:31:32 -0000

I'd rather just add more bits to the timestamp so that ±100 years of range
doesn't have to be a concern.

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021, 11:25 James Browning <jamesb.fe80@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021, at 8:09 AM Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 11:00 AM James Browning <jamesb.fe80@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> My shortlist is to shift the epoch to 2020, (a)symmetric authentication
>>> to extensions, and the timescale to TAI based not UTC based.
>>>
>>
>> Can we have something less cursed? The engineers of our civil calendar
>> chose the birth of their savior, and you want to choose *2020*?
>>
>
> (/topic)I picked something with 136 years of future instead of throwing
> 50, 120, or 2020 years into the past.(topic)
>
> Do you have a better year that is _after_ some of us were born?
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email