IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: NTPv5: big picture

Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> Mon, 04 January 2021 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2145C3A0DD8 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 07:08:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SBw9ypl1ixLv for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 07:08:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.uni-regensburg.de (mx4.uni-regensburg.de [194.94.157.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C7603A0DD6 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 07:08:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id C66D56000055 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:08:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de (gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.5.51]) by mx4.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22545600004E for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:08:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from uni-regensburg-smtp1-MTA by gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 16:08:21 +0100
Message-Id: <5FF32F64020000A10003DF5E@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 18.3.0
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 16:08:20 +0100
From: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: kurt@roeckx.be
Cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>, doug.arnold@meinberg-usa.com
References: <20210101025440.ECE3340605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> <0DF4D79B-29BA-4DB0-A3D6-EE3B6AE807DF@meinberg-usa.com> <5FF32347020000A10003DF2E@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <X/MnlJoHMEW5rG1Y@roeckx.be>
In-Reply-To: <X/MnlJoHMEW5rG1Y@roeckx.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/UcZtSWF9fERKwNO-4RfBrowvlic>
Subject: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: NTPv5: big picture
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 15:08:34 -0000

>>> Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> schrieb am 04.01.2021 um 15:35 in Nachricht
<X/MnlJoHMEW5rG1Y@roeckx.be>:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 03:16:39PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> Should dynamic addition, reconfiguration and deletion of time sources be a
>> SHOULD for v5 at least?
> 
> I think the draft should not document a protocol for how to do
> that. That is an implementation detail. It should probably not
> even go over the UDP port.

Well, maybe not an on-wire protocol, but maybe an algorithm. So the implementer still has the choice how to trigger the algorithm.

> 
> 
> Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email