Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs: Clear positions....

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Wed, 10 December 2014 12:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9571A88D3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:42:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r-e_lzPHgCWd for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:42:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-f41.google.com (mail-qg0-f41.google.com [209.85.192.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 900871A1BC0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:42:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id j5so2011971qga.28 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:42:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Aqxh/9Kmuqd8S5OmprAkj4zzxOk0s3XNpte5B0fH/bo=; b=JLB71iFicKYzcYb/Y6R7VLWSHTgxJ6t4omTnPmVjHvrNh+mljHWW8k1LP8o9aK0S0E dhGTKHjKRd1lgqHVV3sWJ8rfR6GYNVAXH4+C7PGaxJmdLmdqb8DfWOxnu4v7Pjh494eA 5im8mUcinLwfADtdpHA+GB+1/oVuzETf8DC984FRmYZtilHJmoVNNDWtSozFJL/3QY+k tbTt8i5oPRmReHrQD3gRGYSkfD52N62Lr+vic80qjvQh98B1rCY4/PEc3aJp+ipXE1YA CwC+5dfekZJoHVQAOyNJbaaWfL/TVbLxCLDgWJfttUX7E/pm7Ye9wUSUdHGn71iPvPgQ yajQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmQ/TF5Opfjp82mnLVQaPZqV8794Z72BUb3d35I06n2M9ALg/m1zFNcSCwQ4WswMu23nP7+
X-Received: by 10.140.22.83 with SMTP id 77mr7475113qgm.19.1418215324824; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:42:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.96.26.135 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:41:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54873575.3030804@nostrum.com>
References: <5486C48D.8040602@alvestrand.no> <F092E8C6-380C-4B20-B71F-449162617BC5@apple.com> <54873575.3030804@nostrum.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:41:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegfne6BZGLMFWPb2jaThj-pm3fSQfkHLKrAuQy6jZvAwBqQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/TFejCPGk2d9wJ1N5nhtFT-96y5I
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs: Clear positions....
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:42:07 -0000

2014-12-09 18:46 GMT+01:00 Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>om>:
> On 12/9/14 11:32, David Singer wrote:
>>
>> I would also like to know from those confirming the sense of the room,
>> whether THEY THEMSELVES intend to...
>
>
> Wait, you're pressing other companies for future product plans? With the
> implication that doing so is a prerequisite to participating in the
> discussion?
>
> That's a mighty sharp blade there. You might check where it's pointed.

According to what I understand, someone announcing that he or his
company will implement both codecs is not about announcing a "product
feature", but just the fact that such a product will be "WebRTC
compliant". And that is what all of this subject is about, isn't?


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>