Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls

Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Tue, 27 September 2011 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CC721F8E42 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.827
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.827 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.188, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FzU+slj473X9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E64221F8E3F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyd12 with SMTP id 12so6618280gyd.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mqrBy9JJHByAsp1Y/zjLZlZr/yWL7WLsu5E0N1cTQCo=; b=B1SFS/gDefkMM/vQ0V4AM9thsuNis+AJYzQWxxNArwlH7RbzijADNdc0Zcscox4FT6 0FA9w13I1d6xY+BOsHSYsHXP1efltvBGIdsEtqp4+z/glvnNdAZbtcQW0Ke0PunGTJoA tmvJbcdGJ2eeUjuRWvHMqxzzubPcYbnwsnN3w=
Received: by 10.236.192.231 with SMTP id i67mr48440460yhn.87.1317137730012; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] (adsl-70-133-70-225.dsl.scrm01.sbcglobal.net. [70.133.70.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p68sm34147484yhj.16.2011.09.27.08.35.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E81EDCF.6040406@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:37:51 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110818 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CAD5OKxtNjmWBz92bRuxka7e-BUpTPgVUvr3ahJGpmZ-U5nuPbQ@mail.gmail.com>, <CAD6AjGSmz5T_F+SK2EoBQm6T-iRKp7dd4j8ZAF5JKdbbyomZQA@mail.gmail.com>, <CALiegfmO54HC+g9L_DYn4jtXAAbLEvS++qxKa6TNrLDREs9SeA@mail.gmail.com>, <4E80984A.903@skype.net>, <CALiegfmyvTb57WVooKryS-ubfcg+w5gZ+zfO1zzBLn3609AzaA@mail.gmail.com>, <4E809EE6.2050702@skype.net>, <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F1087@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>, <BLU152-W62B7F2AC3F0D5B6E277CB993F00@phx.gbl>, <CAD5OKxt=P3jg9N0weFUZLvUYQxyeXa+9YMtpc8wn7osuPQmTpg@mail.gmail.com>, <CAD5OKxtVCgiFV_iAYd1w0uZZcS5+gsixOHJ0jGN=0CMdq++kdg@mail.gmail.com>, <CAOJ7v-3PrnNyesL+x-mto9Q9djjiJ13QZHXCiGfY1mv3nubrqQ@mail.gmail.com>, <CAD5OKxsKTHCuBQdUnGQtGfF7NmZZExLe9Q9B9cNR=483neuHPQ@mail.gmail.com> <BLU152-W295A7FCD81C6C902B37A3993F00@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU152-W295A7FCD81C6C902B37A3993F00@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:32:48 -0000

Maybe if we narrow down that selection to those that can update car 
drivers to those that have met standards (and maybe ahhh "Class E" 
licensed software upload).

On 09/27/2011 08:23 AM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> I'm not going to use this mailing list as an advertising medium, but 
> there do exist products that support both ICE and SRTP, and some of 
> the companies you name below have deployed those products to 
> *thousands* of their employees.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:12:18 -0400
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls
> From: roman@telurix.com
> To: juberti@google.com
> CC: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com; rtcweb@ietf.org
>
> I am sorry, but can you name "robust telephony services" that 
> currently provide ICE and SRTP support in US? AFAK Verizon, Qwest, 
> Level3, Global Crossing, Paetec, XO do not provide this.
> _____________
> Roman Shpount
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>    


-- 

---
<i>The wheel.</i metro-link=t dzonatasolyndra>