IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls

Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com> Tue, 27 September 2011 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@phonefromhere.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5714821F8D5C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m3NEfcz-uKtU for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zimbra.westhawk.co.uk (zimbra.westhawk.co.uk [192.67.4.167]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED9F21F8D83 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.106] (udp089063uds.ucsf.edu [169.230.111.60]) by zimbra.westhawk.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A72037A902; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:40:41 +0100 (BST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_104D4D70-81A2-4CCD-BB7E-394C6B430942"
From: Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxsy2eKx5Bc8iayYazSyyykZZTGx9UO7NEE=fxYYdouy0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:27:48 -0700
Message-Id: <92A2BA22-46D6-441E-BD5B-2387A025F37A@phonefromhere.com>
References: <CAD5OKxtNjmWBz92bRuxka7e-BUpTPgVUvr3ahJGpmZ-U5nuPbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGSmz5T_F+SK2EoBQm6T-iRKp7dd4j8ZAF5JKdbbyomZQA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmO54HC+g9L_DYn4jtXAAbLEvS++qxKa6TNrLDREs9SeA@mail.gmail.com> <4E80984A.903@skype.net> <CALiegfmyvTb57WVooKryS-ubfcg+w5gZ+zfO1zzBLn3609AzaA@mail.gmail.com> <4E809EE6.2050702@skype.net> <CAD5OKxvUOadaU0dnB7-Ho9cZ92VY+4Owuhj7oKPCx9Jy1iwT1Q@mail.gmail.com> <C2DF2C51-B3F7-443D-A047-7E6FB03E6D20@phonefromhere.com> <CAD5OKxsy2eKx5Bc8iayYazSyyykZZTGx9UO7NEE=fxYYdouy0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:25:03 -0000

On 27 Sep 2011, at 07:46, Roman Shpount wrote:
> 
> How real or big do you think this problem is going to be? None of the current SIP/VoIP clients address this now, and we have quite a number of them out there. I understand that this is an attack vector but how big of an attack vector is this going to be if we ask for user confirmation? 
> _____________
> Roman Shpount


It actually doesn't matter what I think. We have to do something here that the browser makers are prepared to deploy. What question would you ask the user that would satisfy them?

Tim.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email