IETF Logo Mail Archive

[saag] Re: [rfc-i] Re: Re: RFCs vs Standards

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sat, 14 December 2024 19:23 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1351C14F694; Sat, 14 Dec 2024 11:23:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=psg.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PIkRCv6qfwNe; Sat, 14 Dec 2024 11:23:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:3807::18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FC39C14F6A7; Sat, 14 Dec 2024 11:23:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=psg.com; s=rgnet-mail; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc: To:From:Message-ID:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=x87pQo9Uh7QsjhdNOhFLXgNyBL8bYmK6QUnqZSxu7vc=; b=klGLInv+olLhwxQSyh+G0WYMSy roauk49jIKP/vGqJiPwhqAjh4uCE4eJUR2s4sKZ48iCPYuiYnszKIKWVu+YeVcuKJH7R7d5rEKPLv 6om4sKItoziLGauezv7H/1Z03cW7Up0J14by+vRiBlrdwhygkwlMVOsr9Uk6U1Nv9Kxp5B8B/ocpK BhouiTbiZj+n3u0BuUZQKg+JjvtkZ7JYcSXLeCWI047IB0pqv2iyqGRON3BsQYtburWY1M4Vnavni zzRAdVn8K1t0l37JaZIy709zlbKERY2TLetvGfXiXcLC1e0wsgROfkyEmFF8Mg8rdfmcKwPlT4pkP KThEd+DA==;
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1tMXjW-001R9u-H9; Sat, 14 Dec 2024 19:23:22 +0000
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 11:23:22 -0800
Message-ID: <m2ldwi6pcl.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <5B7149CA-9855-4BC3-82B2-6EE0FBC8DEF0@tzi.org>
References: <GVXPR07MB9678085DBA938C8FCE6CE9DE89382@GVXPR07MB9678.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <m2pllv79sn.wl-randy@psg.com> <5B7149CA-9855-4BC3-82B2-6EE0FBC8DEF0@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.2 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID-Hash: ZYUTD3HKCSO3CQ27J5DI6FSXTX65TIKE
X-Message-ID-Hash: ZYUTD3HKCSO3CQ27J5DI6FSXTX65TIKE
X-MailFrom: randy@psg.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-saag.ietf.org-0; header-match-saag.ietf.org-1; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, IETF SAAG <saag@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [saag] Re: [rfc-i] Re: Re: RFCs vs Standards
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/yOvrKH-NOE4gBZH01WoMcXvkDJA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:saag-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:saag-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:saag-leave@ietf.org>

> Or if somebody suggests doing half of the work on slack, point to:
> https://specificsuggestions.com/share/EN/4299.html

of course that does not apply to github issues vs mailing list
discussion

when we want to sabatoge, we just have a bof with chair(s) of the
desired persuasion and stuff the room.

randy

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status