Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2?
Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Mon, 22 August 2011 16:00 UTC
Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37C721F863A; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.959
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.959 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.960, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 863SP34aWu+S; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from darkstar.isi.edu (darkstar.isi.edu [128.9.128.127]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F9521F853E; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by darkstar.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7MG1VPO014838 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E527D5B.2080104@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:01:31 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
References: <AANLkTimq3hcdK7-f_Pa9sWJJOTzF_GBLcYu36sB3WszN@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaaVbmExEM2ZwBf5Ur6aRbBayxX13xGBL27r-svOmC3Wvg@mail.gmail.com> <001801cc60bb$19329d00$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <001801cc60bb$19329d00$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>, sidr-chairs@ietf.org, sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2?
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:00:45 -0000
Hi, Tom, On 8/22/2011 4:03 AM, t.petch wrote: > Chris > > I don't know if your training included > draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-10 > currently in AUTH48 but it does say, as some on this list know well, > > " A service name or port number assignment request contains the > following information. The service name is the unique identifier of > a given service: > > Service Name (REQUIRED) > Transport Protocol(s) (REQUIRED) > Assignee (REQUIRED) > Contact (REQUIRED) > Description (REQUIRED) > Reference (REQUIRED) > Port Number (OPTIONAL) > Service Code (REQUIRED for DCCP only) > Known Unauthorized Uses (OPTIONAL) > Assignment Notes (OPTIONAL)" > > which suggests a fairly rapid rejection of our I-D. Sure, but on trivial grounds (the service names you provide have spaces). To assist with your application, here's a suggestion (this need not be in the RFC, but the RFC should conform to the following information where it differs, e.g., the list of requested service names - note that this isn't guaranteed to fly, though, as per below): Service Name (REQUIRED) RPKI-Rtr Transport Protocol(s) (REQUIRED) TCP Assignee (REQUIRED) IESG <iesg@ietf.org> (as per sec 8.1.1.) Contact (REQUIRED) IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org> Description (REQUIRED) request/response exchange, including an initial message indicating version number; data transferred as native records with in-band record separators and transaction terminators; transport connection is persistent across multiple request/response exchanges; exchanges MUST be protected by access control, and MAY use TCP MD5, TCP-AO, or IPsec Reference (REQUIRED) See RFC (TBD) Port Number (OPTIONAL) any in the well-known range Service Code (REQUIRED for DCCP only) N/A Known Unauthorized Uses (OPTIONAL) N/A Assignment Notes (OPTIONAL) Service Name (REQUIRED) RPKI-Rtr-TLS Transport Protocol(s) (REQUIRED) TCP Assignee (REQUIRED) (as per sec 8.1.1.) Contact (REQUIRED) IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org> Description (REQUIRED) request/response exchange, including an initial message indicating version number; data transferred as native records with in-band record separators and transaction terminators; transport connection is persistent across multiple request/response exchanges; exchanges MUST be protected by access control and TLS Reference (REQUIRED)See RFC (TBD) Port Number (OPTIONAL) any in the well-known range Service Code (REQUIRED for DCCP only) N/A Known Unauthorized Uses (OPTIONAL) N/A Assignment Notes (OPTIONAL) Regarding Chris's question: On 8/22/2011 6:17 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > Oddly, 'CONTACT' there is a person? or a WG? a 'person' seems > non-scalable in a number of dimensions. Again see Sec 8.1.1. It's a person (usually the person who issues the request) in all cases except IETF document stream assignments. > The section on two ports or > one, which I alluded to earlier, is section 7.2 which starts with > " o IANA strives to assign only one assigned port number per service > or application"\ This was updated as a result of IETF last call and IESG review. The current text (pending final typo corrections) reads as follows (the tracker here shows this:) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports/writeup/ -- o IANA strives to assign only one assigned port number per service or application Note: At the time of writing of this document there is no IETF consensus on when it is appropriate to use a second port for an insecure version of a protocol. -- This is a bit of a sticky example, mostly because you're asking for a well-known port. It'd help to have IESG consensus on the use of an insecure protocol in that range. The current doc is a bit confusing on this point - do you ever intend to allow both insecure and TCP MD5/TCP-AO/IPsec on the same port? AFAICT, you actually want (need) three ports: RPKI-Rtr-open - insecure RPKI-Rtr-tnsec - transport/network security RPKI-Rtr-apsec - application-layer security (TLS) Then you need to explain clearly why you *cannot* determine which category a connection falls from the packets that arrive -- and performance alone is not a sufficient reason (that could then be used to argue, e.g., for dozens of ports for various services, and the port space is too limited to support that just for performance reasons). It seems like -open is an uphill issue if you ask for a well-known port, IMO. Joe
- [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Jared Mauch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? John Scudder
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Matthias Waehlisch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Hannes Gredler
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Hannes Gredler
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Stephen Kent
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? John Scudder
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Matthias Waehlisch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? John Scudder
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Hannes Gredler
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Danny McPherson
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Hannes Gredler
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Brian Weis
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Brian Weis
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Hannes Gredler
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Smith, Donald
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Hannes Gredler
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Hannes Gredler
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Brian Weis
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Pradosh Mohapatra
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Pradosh Mohapatra
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Sandra Murphy
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Geoff Huston
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Geoff Huston
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Hannes Gredler
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Matthias Waehlisch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Stephen Kent
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Joe Touch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Brian Weis
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Joe Touch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Joe Touch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Joe Touch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? t.petch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Joe Touch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? t.petch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Joe Touch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? t.petch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Uma Chunduri
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Sandra Murphy
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? John Scudder
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Uma Chunduri
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Uma Chunduri
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Uma Chunduri
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Paul Hoffman
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Joe Touch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Joe Touch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Joe Touch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Robert Raszuk
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Robert Raszuk
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Hannes Gredler
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Robert Raszuk
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- [sidr] TLS (Was: Re: WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - t… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] TLS (Was: Re: WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? John Scudder
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] draft-sidr-rpki-rtr t.petch
- Re: [sidr] draft-sidr-rpki-rtr Joe Touch
- Re: [sidr] draft-sidr-rpki-rtr Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] draft-sidr-rpki-rtr Stewart Bryant
- Re: [sidr] draft-sidr-rpki-rtr t.petch
- Re: [sidr] draft-sidr-rpki-rtr Joe Touch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? t.petch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? t.petch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Joe Touch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Joe Touch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? t.petch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Joe Touch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Paul Hoffman
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Joe Touch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Paul Hoffman
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Joe Touch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? t.petch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? t.petch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Joe Touch
- Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2? Joe Touch