IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] DNSSEC also needs CT

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Fri, 23 May 2014 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1BA1A01C4 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 May 2014 06:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.029
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.029 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wt-KS70dm1z8 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 May 2014 06:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22e.google.com (mail-vc0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE0201A01C0 for <trans@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2014 06:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hq11so422589vcb.5 for <trans@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2014 06:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=jF2JgHYLrHke0DwKI2F5daOUccGm8B0+Gff9u0EvwZI=; b=YcuRs5XveBui0fa0Ppwaf1ZazwHxzHjFcpCz35xAGfu713VOtmwuts7ZbN3x5cKwDU OSZ754pBhUPcdOFU+PvnmKjpOSF16OCreOXkqX3X26Teh7fots4ftICPFBpS0kCxGLCr hQAAgZa2KG+H3umjhV5UV4huZhkx5tNwH5T7qC0+6CVGDWMkKysBgZ8jtPzlMiUy1uGy U97KOIZ7/J4ne1G/QWPfzeIY/JnlziQuDsjsaY9zRSKikk6eaQPk50e0ijhRWsr4+EQm 1nnEMOa2e7xaoaGUDMghIGFlz+QLt2sXTIJKklDvvMdqE4nx18pmVofnrYP+kli8GFRn W40A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jF2JgHYLrHke0DwKI2F5daOUccGm8B0+Gff9u0EvwZI=; b=V9UrIDFwEHZxEPFuDjfGJa4X3ElLfNPUD5lJVByS+VmMghzQRVel/G+jxP+JBJIwye EmfKbd9uENL9eANz4ChSI3KgeLnclUiOPBbArAK/ndqOp6l93F5Ap0De8Hbi+gnFefKu HogLanaF1k06RnX2kh+lV5BM6nABpCgr+Vs5Uk0HjZ/xoe6r+DsRnB5wXk3RkZYm1OgY rZXoKQTNNsT8R3A8OuEeC4fd/N/T56IcULPEj+r15po2zOM+W9IIxnCJ2d4VrIXDIqho xXC2tGzcDmiUA15zdnXT88+eyfN+rrNVUTJyjmleS1umex0H7mMXoappaCRUgStvIAOg QccA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnFSZvyHHKZ2/89No+E38FFybjsKrDW/Pa3tjnAs8bej66hKppazRF5v/a4jB03yx/KlmrM
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.126.135 with SMTP id my7mr4036301veb.27.1400850098756; Fri, 23 May 2014 06:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.107.132 with HTTP; Fri, 23 May 2014 06:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwhOCwmK=8qXpDRbBpXDiPB3Ei73zV4M1ZkczKQxmfnOwA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK3OfOjiL2DTJPH3CaAjg8YGrrwN56SgQ+DnqPXx4MLbgXQN+A@mail.gmail.com> <537E3229.4070402@bbn.com> <CAMm+Lwjbi5t7Efgyf4cNdh-2=DqbeSE4xgxf3TchPZBAyERwug@mail.gmail.com> <537E3E17.8000901@bbn.com> <CAMm+LwhOCwmK=8qXpDRbBpXDiPB3Ei73zV4M1ZkczKQxmfnOwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 14:01:38 +0100
Message-ID: <CABrd9STtNBGr4dnsbGfgpsXacNg2Jy0=pU=gUNMtmupnc9kR1g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <ietf@hallambaker.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b675e5285387e04fa10d417"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/n7VPP-Zuh0nOdAgNFe_pGBVj9XI
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>, Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Subject: Re: [Trans] DNSSEC also needs CT
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 13:01:42 -0000

On 22 May 2014 21:45, Phillip Hallam-Baker <ietf@hallambaker.com> wrote:

> Trans is rather too closely designed to solve one problem and it is
> not even clear that it does that particularly well. There is a lot of
> fuzziness in the process by which a relying party decides that a
> particular value is the true Merkle tree apex of a particular log.
>

FWIW, I plan to explain more clearly our plans in this area shortly (which
are actually quite solid, but not yet documented usefully).

-- 
Certificate Transparency is hiring! Let me know if you're interested.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email