Re: [tsvwg] Review comments on a careful read of the L4S ID (#11. Cubic)

[Gorry Fairhurst <[e-mail]>]

On 14/05/2021 13:04, Bob Briscoe wrote:
> Gorry, tsvwg,
> See [BB]
>
> On 06/05/2021 07:52, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
>>
>> =================================================================
>> *11.Reference TCP Cubic in addition to TCP Reno*
>> **
>> This text:
>> “ClassicCongestion Control:A congestion control behaviour that can
>> co-exist with standard TCP Reno [RFC5681] without causing
>> significantly negative impact on its flow rate [RFC5033].”
>> **
>> ⁃This is one of a number of references to TCP Reno, which would be 
>> enhanced by also referencing TCP Cubic to avoid criticisms that 
>> comparison with TCP Reno is dated and limited.
>> =================================================================
>
> [BB] For the record, as discussed in the tsvwg meeting, "standard TCP 
> Reno" has already been modified (in two normative sentences) to:
>
> "...Classic congestion controls such as standard Reno..."
>
>
> Bob
>
>
> -- 
> ________________________________________________________________
> Bob Briscoehttp://bobbriscoe.net/

Sounds good to me.

Gorry