Re: [tsvwg] Review comments on a careful read of the L4S ID (27. Appx B & C)

[Bob Briscoe <[e-mail]>]

Chairs, Martin,
See [BB]

On 06/05/2021 07:52, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
>
> =================================================================
> *27. Appendix B and C
> *
> ⁃Appendix B is lengthy, at best loosely connected with the rest of the 
> draft, definitely out of date, and not aligned with current WG views 
> of this area. This appendix can be removed prior to publication. 
> Appendix C is unecessary to the final publication.
> =================================================================

[BB] Offlist discussion with the chairs and Martin has come up with the 
solution of deleting the sub-sections of these appendices that are not 
referenced from the rest of the draft, but keeping those that are.

B.1 is referenced from the body of the draft a couple of times, because 
it's the pros and cons of the chosen scheme.
C.1 is referenced from the security considerations.

So I'm planning on promoting B.1 to B, and C.1 to C.
But I'll take out the remainder of B and C, and change the introductory 
context of each.

For reference, here's the end of the ToC as it stands before the 
proposed edits:

   Appendix B  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#appendix-B>.  Alternative Identifiers  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .46  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#page-46>
      B.1  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#appendix-B.1>.  ECT(1) and CE codepoints  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#page-47>
      B.2  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#appendix-B.2>.  ECN-DualQ-SCE1  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .51  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#page-51>
      B.3  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#appendix-B.3>.  ECN-DualQ-SCE0  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#page-54>
      B.4  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#appendix-B.4>.  ECN Plus a Diffserv Codepoint (DSCP)  . . . . . . . . . .56  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#page-56>
      B.5  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#appendix-B.5>.  ECN capability alone  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#page-58>
      B.6  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#appendix-B.6>.  Protocol ID . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#page-58>
      B.7  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#appendix-B.7>.  Source or destination addressing  . . . . . . . . . . . .59  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#page-59>
      B.8  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#appendix-B.8>.  Summary: Merits of Alternative Identifiers  . . . . . . .59  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#page-59>
    Appendix C  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#appendix-C>.  Potential Competing Uses for the ECT(1) Codepoint  .  60
      C.1  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#appendix-C.1>.  Integrity of Congestion Feedback  . . . . . . . . . . . .60  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#page-60>
      C.2  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#appendix-C.2>.  Notification of Less Severe Congestion than CE  . . . . .61  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id#page-61>



Bob

-- 
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe                               http://bobbriscoe.net/