IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v4v6interim] [46translation] [BEHAVE] Proposal for new BEHAVE charter

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 21 October 2008 09:50 UTC

Return-Path: <v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: v4v6interim-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v4v6interim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA8A3A6ACE; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA553A6ACE; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4FNffmjidN5e; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ind-iport-1.cisco.com (ind-iport-1.cisco.com [64.104.129.195]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EFE33A6A7C; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,456,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="31381804"
Received: from hkg-dkim-2.cisco.com ([10.75.231.163]) by ind-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2008 09:51:13 +0000
Received: from hkg-core-1.cisco.com (hkg-core-1.cisco.com [64.104.123.94]) by hkg-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m9L9pC8P028911; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:51:12 +0800
Received: from xbh-hkg-411.apac.cisco.com (xbh-hkg-411.cisco.com [64.104.123.72]) by hkg-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9L9pC4A012524; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:51:12 GMT
Received: from xfe-hkg-411.apac.cisco.com ([64.104.123.70]) by xbh-hkg-411.apac.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:50:58 +0800
Received: from [64.104.120.94] ([64.104.120.94]) by xfe-hkg-411.apac.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:50:57 +0800
Message-Id: <B5A2E7E1-7FAE-48B6-85E2-B1300DF1458D@cisco.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <01462145-8E18-465A-8989-D1C98D421DED@muada.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:50:57 +0800
References: <48F8539D.90608@ericsson.com> <48FB9C5E.8070402@gmail.com> <3E041E8D-8539-4A16-9188-86A1DCEEE62B@muada.com> <200810201358.29295.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> <8E5328A8-4937-41A8-A650-204795E074D1@muada.com> <5B78195C-1318-4325-8F98-BC19F59E1532@cisco.com> <01462145-8E18-465A-8989-D1C98D421DED@muada.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Oct 2008 09:50:57.0733 (UTC) FILETIME=[845DEF50:01C93362]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=862; t=1224582672; x=1225446672; c=relaxed/simple; s=hkgdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[46translation]=20[BEHAVE]=20[v4v6inter im]=20Proposal=20for=20new=20BEHAVE=20charter |Sender:=20; bh=bRCfwV1VPiQeV0BcEm5baHmkLLJMCiRp2RqYiDRVz84=; b=k4Ivjgp+W/sL2w2k5fUV0x7LbV+QlZDG/5MKBgTCf0QVcSTxhsZE0CwtT9 JfFtAPZ7uU4NMBXak0PLKOIPrZH6PKPA0OBK6xUUYP/yMM0I9tkeHsVN1YUs UecwaSvligL19QDbn3EcC64Sry/h2pG51WhaEcjlX7ZW/9quP6+xk=;
Authentication-Results: hkg-dkim-2; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/hkgdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: Behave WG <behave@ietf.org>, v4v6interim@ietf.org, 46Translation <46translation@employees.org>, iab@iab.org
Subject: Re: [v4v6interim] [46translation] [BEHAVE] Proposal for new BEHAVE charter
X-BeenThere: v4v6interim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of coexistence topics for the 01-Oct-2008 v4-v6 coexistence interim meeting <v4v6interim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/v4v6interim>
List-Post: <mailto:v4v6interim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org

On Oct 21, 2008, at 3:54 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 20 okt 2008, at 23:41, Fred Baker wrote:
>> On Oct 20, 2008, at 7:21 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>>> Of course the IETF could also come out and say that it will not  
>>> accommodate any type of IPv6 NAT.
>
>> That will travel about one meter and nose-dive. Remember the IETF  
>> being deluded into thinking that if it didn't work on lawful  
>> intercept the problem would go away?
>
> Didn't it? This is now "solved" outside the IETF AFAIK.

It's very much part of my world.

As to the rest of what you said, I'll agree with you that in a very  
real sense that ship has sailed, and I'll point out that we run the  
same protocols on IPv6 that we run on IPv4. If we have indeed made the  
protocols NAT-accepting for IPv4, I'll bet they are NAT-accepting on  
IPv6 as well.
_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email