Re: [v4v6interim] [BEHAVE] [46translation] Proposal for new BEHAVE charter

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Thu, 23 October 2008 14:33 UTC

Return-Path: <v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: v4v6interim-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v4v6interim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E153A69C9; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1754A3A69C9; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.148
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.148 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.101, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZlQZo9b3Na+V; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BB03A68CE; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id CB32D2214F; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:34:54 +0200 (CEST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-aef86bb00000537b-14-49008b8eca08
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.123]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id BB5B321479; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:34:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.174]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:34:54 +0200
Received: from [147.214.183.48] ([147.214.183.48]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:34:53 +0200
Message-ID: <49008B8E.9080408@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:34:54 +0200
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
References: <48F8539D.90608@ericsson.com> <48FB9C5E.8070402@gmail.com> <3E041E8D-8539-4A16-9188-86A1DCEEE62B@muada.com> <200810201358.29295.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> <8E5328A8-4937-41A8-A650-204795E074D1@muada.com> <5B78195C-1318-4325-8F98-BC19F59E1532@cisco.com> <01462145-8E18-465A-8989-D1C98D421DED@muada.com> <B5A2E7E1-7FAE-48B6-85E2-B1300DF1458D@cisco.com> <9E0384AB-A20B-44E7-8575-9275101FF920@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <9E0384AB-A20B-44E7-8575-9275101FF920@muada.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Oct 2008 14:34:53.0876 (UTC) FILETIME=[83868F40:01C9351C]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: v4v6interim@ietf.org, 46Translation <46translation@employees.org>, Behave WG <behave@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v4v6interim] [BEHAVE] [46translation] Proposal for new BEHAVE charter
X-BeenThere: v4v6interim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of coexistence topics for the 01-Oct-2008 v4-v6 coexistence interim meeting <v4v6interim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/v4v6interim>
List-Post: <mailto:v4v6interim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org

Anyway,

Are anyone that thinks that NAT66 is so important that it takes
precedence over the NAT46 translator work? If not, can we postpone this
until we are ready to publish something on address family translators?

The reason I ask the above is that we will have enough work for all the
people in the translator work. Thus trying to avoid splitting the forces
to thinly.

Magnus

Iljitsch van Beijnum skrev:
> On 21 okt 2008, at 11:50, Fred Baker wrote:
> 
>> As to the rest of what you said, I'll agree with you that in a very
>> real sense that ship has sailed, and I'll point out that we run the
>> same protocols on IPv6 that we run on IPv4. If we have indeed made the
>> protocols NAT-accepting for IPv4, I'll bet they are NAT-accepting on
>> IPv6 as well.
> 
> If only things were this simple.
> 
> Many apps that break with NAT do referrals by IP address. So they must
> be updated to work with IPv6, and gain significant additional logic to
> work in a dual stack world. Things like STUN and ICE and their
> proprietary counterparts thus need to be reinvented/implemented for v6
> to make referrals work, and/or the UPnP/NAT-PMP protocols that open up
> ports in NAT devices must be recreated for IPv6 if port overloading
> NAT66s happen.
> 
> Today the routing people are complaining that the IPv6 builders didn't
> fix routing. I wonder if in 10 years the apps people are going to
> complain that we didn't fix NAT but just let the same thing happen as in
> IPv4 which BEHAVE has been trying to clean up.
> _______________________________________________
> Behave mailing list
> Behave@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave
> 


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone +46 8 4048287
Färögatan 6                | Fax   +46 8 7575550
S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim