IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v4v6interim] [BEHAVE] [46translation] Proposal for new BEHAVEcharter

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Thu, 23 October 2008 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: v4v6interim-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v4v6interim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16F93A6AC5; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160E93A6AB1; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:46:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vJaHWtmXk3cP; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C843A6A96; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,471,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="95236093"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Oct 2008 17:47:07 +0000
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m9NHl7aE031980; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:47:07 -0700
Received: from dwingwxp01 ([10.32.240.195]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9NHl7GT015415; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:47:07 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: 'Margaret Wasserman' <mrw@lilacglade.org>
References: <48F8539D.90608@ericsson.com> <48FB9C5E.8070402@gmail.com> <3E041E8D-8539-4A16-9188-86A1DCEEE62B@muada.com> <200810201358.29295.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> <8E5328A8-4937-41A8-A650-204795E074D1@muada.com> <5B78195C-1318-4325-8F98-BC19F59E1532@cisco.com> <01462145-8E18-465A-8989-D1C98D421DED@muada.com> <B5A2E7E1-7FAE-48B6-85E2-B1300DF1458D@cisco.com> <9E0384AB-A20B-44E7-8575-9275101FF920@muada.com><49008B8E.9080408@ericsson.com> <49008F1E.3010804@cisco.com> <EE6DCD77-43B9-40A8-B0BC-FAE79B3D8B49@lilacglade.org> <031d01c93535$c85b1140$9d6d6b80@cisco.com> <4C1AFFD1-34DF-4DDE-A081-09C652A63CF4@lilacglade.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:47:06 -0700
Message-ID: <036801c93537$5dc254e0$9d6d6b80@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <4C1AFFD1-34DF-4DDE-A081-09C652A63CF4@lilacglade.org>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Thread-Index: Ack1NqDb6kA1/p1zTMuZjq83poHN4QAAIHfQ
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=865; t=1224784027; x=1225648027; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Dan=20Wing=22=20<dwing@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[BEHAVE]=20[v4v6interim]=20[46translati on]=20Proposal=20for=20new=20BEHAVEcharter |Sender:=20; bh=pzFS4uvW74FZLQ6f/87NONtMgjOLevsyNiYlGQu9/WE=; b=K+pQlCtx6sy2FHXgV8+LvScLTdELltrnncKSBnkBHjkkLSnkbN4aFdYdIo FsxYPCTrfRCcG2N3RK9hyPnaSmVil20qRhPeF2ojY8hEGcY/UPYDEp+gzWnn LEVzvh+oNX2U+BXiI8jYYfYgkC+X5hD1CqsdFNuMT6ITqWpgSrQc0=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=dwing@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Cc: v4v6interim@ietf.org, '46Translation' <46translation@employees.org>, 'Behave WG' <behave@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v4v6interim] [BEHAVE] [46translation] Proposal for new BEHAVEcharter
X-BeenThere: v4v6interim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of coexistence topics for the 01-Oct-2008 v4-v6 coexistence interim meeting <v4v6interim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/v4v6interim>
List-Post: <mailto:v4v6interim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org

> On Oct 23, 2008, at 1:35 PM, Dan Wing wrote:
> > BEHAVE is being re-chartered, so if the community wants BEHAVE to
> > do NAT66, now is a good time to tell the IESG to include NAT66 in
> > BEHAVE's charter.  (as you all know.)  The new charter, at this
> > time, does not include NAT66.
> >
> > And I only stated my desire to avoid the 'third rail'; the IESG can
> > certainly decide they want NAT66 standardized.  Based on my
> > understanding of how NAT66 would work, it would belong in BEHAVE.
> 
> Thanks, Dan.  This is very reasonable.
> 
> So, what's the best way forward?  Perhaps I could write a 
> draft, sent  
> a pointer to behave, and we could have a discussion over the next  
> couple of weeks about whether the community does/doesn't want to  
> include this in the new behave charter?

Yes, that would be ideal.  Thanks!

-d

_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email