Re: WG meeting structure

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 15 May 2019 00:46 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722B51200EC for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:46:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gjpgtU_ZMIXW for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80F0C1201D8 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911B53826E; Tue, 14 May 2019 20:45:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 94C7C1008; Tue, 14 May 2019 20:46:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9360BAA4; Tue, 14 May 2019 20:46:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
cc: wgchairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG meeting structure
In-Reply-To: <61D81D11-1BA0-4123-80C9-C7A97297ED5C@episteme.net>
References: <61D81D11-1BA0-4123-80C9-C7A97297ED5C@episteme.net>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 20:46:00 -0400
Message-ID: <5553.1557881160@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/_0JyJNctaTVQqYUpomIc5xO6Tnw>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 00:46:07 -0000

Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> wrote:
    > How many of you be willing to run a WG session this way if the setup was
    > offered?

Yes. Yes. Yes. YES!!!


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-