Re: WG meeting structure

Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org> Wed, 15 May 2019 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <krose@krose.org>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C901200F9 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 19:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=krose.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pmxs2LlGHgJM for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 19:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb35.google.com (mail-yb1-xb35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C1DF120026 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2019 19:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb35.google.com with SMTP id k202so396660ybk.2 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2019 19:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=krose.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zPZLjJu2cCgacLzK1tQURtZs57vuqYfroaMiXKPNga8=; b=bhyLMCY6PSBaDPUYh86qy9wrOYc46pJtlhujUgqUpiuGCUbD6N1XpdfHQ5Ng9ui/0Q KwUm7oktCnxqU9A3hSvknuG2Uaz2k6TjKPHOX9bWM/BnaHnbMSPmllB36CgzIAeA60vL 5EgsNs04BeUJNowCkpru+hZi/aPkT/QYPHeWc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zPZLjJu2cCgacLzK1tQURtZs57vuqYfroaMiXKPNga8=; b=GOC42iE3MptxWJ14XQ2wHUDZj5QIeKHeeKT60444oVrBvKTWLFIkQrJ35H0zQZj1MY MPXVebyEJGvGCeb3Y5QQ7eS5CuVp7XaBhlPCzD65sbgWr7H+kVYUPx7BgA5wMnM0VxCS Fwv1vbZx9VDKTd8WKLWhZr4UPmSe/Ns9/D+A4hmFDnaSfx8xr/cJ6ZGP1qiu8GVnMH8+ NpFjio0SqdmTO8w1zZJxBal5JNDXjYzgMxbj5QqnILUNS2lQsYZ95xpdbCRWFDcxPX1v l3kEgZosKNZQwOt0ema6zHW+13yyA2TC0CtEclP/tiCGJpRyZgQxjfTAX8/UcBeMc3fr wh8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXHBWayda6TIMllrHA+TXTEp8UA+6GFAJQg/p95QQgw8yLVp/+f ua+ne5d22GuPMnm/2NaFxv0Ltg/L2Fl35hddED/r5Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx0ZufIqUd2TsZtEEuncfO5YTIwDmRIKDaoPKo6iWpHyvRH3k/ATyRgfFjYoijlx0noqtNJe5iBiKioDU2Yml4=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:3616:: with SMTP id d22mr18766846yba.73.1557886066497; Tue, 14 May 2019 19:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <61D81D11-1BA0-4123-80C9-C7A97297ED5C@episteme.net> <BF668B4C-6D67-4D7D-A31F-C24523F04EB2@gmail.com> <CAJU8_nUGXL6D1E6Sx-byC8FX66LZb=xe6rDf9_45bqd+0peXng@mail.gmail.com> <CAD62q9U1do+3K5g8KXYJpmuZ2mR2JFBOxt1Qi=bn2v-=QxGUxA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD62q9U1do+3K5g8KXYJpmuZ2mR2JFBOxt1Qi=bn2v-=QxGUxA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 22:07:35 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJU8_nUUJPU19msBJrBJ2WyxgBKOqBKMz-scDKG5C=-2eqPtRw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: WG meeting structure
To: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>, WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000982f100588e39d6c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/m-wRXDfWCKaFYapAGtdGPoO6roA>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 02:07:49 -0000

On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:01 PM Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> wrote:

> Technical issues aside (more mics?), WG chairs already have pretty wide
>> latitude to run the meetings in the way they feel is most appropriate. This
>> includes how to recognize speakers. It seems some experiments are in order.
>> FWIW, I attended the QUIC session in Berlin (?) where this U shape was
>> employed, and I thought it worked quite well.
>>
>
>  My recollection is that the experiments with the U-shaped table were
> considered a success for the people who were there and a failure for any
> remote participants because they had a difficult time hearing and
> participating in the conversation.
>

If true, this is definitely a problem, but it also feels like one that can
be solved with better equipment.

A related consideration might be providing a virtual place at the table for
remote participants who are critical participants in a particular
discussion, which might mean augmenting meetecho with the ability for
chair-selected remotes to speak without the chair pressing the big red
button.

Kyle