Re: WG meeting structure
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sat, 18 May 2019 03:19 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3711200D8 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 May 2019 20:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Veea0CqB_4Ot for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 May 2019 20:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0AEC120049 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 May 2019 20:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] (unknown [119.94.160.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4652633F5AF; Sat, 18 May 2019 05:19:40 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: WG meeting structure
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, wgchairs@ietf.org
References: <61D81D11-1BA0-4123-80C9-C7A97297ED5C@episteme.net> <BF668B4C-6D67-4D7D-A31F-C24523F04EB2@gmail.com> <CAJU8_nUGXL6D1E6Sx-byC8FX66LZb=xe6rDf9_45bqd+0peXng@mail.gmail.com> <EFF30784-E39A-43EE-ADCB-0F0561EA6430@gmail.com> <23773.39810.527083.979022@gro.dd.org> <E832787C-F0E3-4424-8F06-C4155C88B28D@gmail.com> <088778b8-f20d-4dd1-40b1-dfc74e1d2e77@pi.nu> <20190517141444.GG20431@kduck.mit.edu> <9a1aa90d-1893-99f9-6810-41ab13e0e21c@pi.nu> <B8212CA3-E675-4959-9679-ADF68A58F02E@gmail.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <5dfb1050-91b7-5cdc-8b76-e0a8eb5eee6a@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 11:19:35 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B8212CA3-E675-4959-9679-ADF68A58F02E@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/zAk4CMTGopa4RQjNQnTYxI0Hshw>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 03:19:46 -0000
Fred and Ben, Inline plz. On 2019-05-17 23:27, Fred Baker wrote: > inline > >> On May 17, 2019, at 8:15 AM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote: >> >> Ben, >> >> >> On 2019-05-17 22:14, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: >>> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 08:37:49PM +0800, Loa Andersson wrote: >>>> All, >>>> >>>> I agree with most of what what Fred says, drawing on experience from >>>> other wg's. >>>> >>>> I'm a bit nervous when this type discussions pops up. As long they are >>>> discussions on "good ideas we tried, and the results we had", I think it >>>> is fine. >>>> >>>> When they slide away to instruct wg chairs what they should do, I'm >>>> very concerned. >>>> >>>> I'm convinced that when it comes to IETF wg's we don't have and will >>>> never have a seating arrangement that fit all wg's, nor fit a single >>>> working group for all of its life time. >>>> >>>> If there are experiments necessary, let the wg chairs do the experiments >>>> and the evaluation of the experiments. >>> There's a bit of a threshold problem, in that the logistics of the chair >>> setup means we need some critical mass of WGs to agree to run the same >>> experiment in the same meeting cycle in order for any of them to happen. >>> But that shouldn't have to take much else away from the WG chairs' control >>> over how to run the WG. >> >> So you are saying that if I would like to run the table setup for a MPLS >> meeting as a U, V or A shape, you are saying that you would stop me just >> because there are no other groups that are doing the same thing? > > I believe that he was saying the hotel will charge something for the service, the service will take some time to perform, and the secretariat will need to understand what you want well enough in advance of the meeting that they can arrange a room in your favorite way and then schedule a number of working/research groups into it for the day. If they arranged it for you alone, they would probably need the time allotted to the slots before and after to rearrange it again. > > So, by all means, arrange the room as you want to. And help them by getting a few other groups to be willing to be scheduled into the room that day. OK - we have done that before - I think in Minneapolis and some other place - for the MPLS working group. Back then we had no tables in the front. We wanted that and talked to the secretariat, they fixed that without any fuzz. WE had a 2.5 hour morning slot and the hotel staff put i back without tables after lunch. Did not affect anyone else, and we had our tables. At that time we did not even call it an experiment. If there are reasons it can't be done, so be it. I still say let the wg chairs handle this. /Loa > >> /Loa >> >>> -Ben >> >> -- >> >> >> Loa Andersson email: loa@pi.nu >> Senior MPLS Expert >> Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, > Defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win. > Sun Tzu > -- Loa Andersson email: loa@pi.nu Senior MPLS Expert Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- WG meeting structure Pete Resnick
- Re: WG meeting structure Joel M. Halpern
- Re: WG meeting structure Stephen Farrell
- Re: WG meeting structure Fred Baker
- Re: WG meeting structure Pete Resnick
- Re: WG meeting structure Michael Richardson
- Re: WG meeting structure Michael Richardson
- Re: WG meeting structure Bob Hinden
- Re: WG meeting structure Martin Thomson
- Re: WG meeting structure Kyle Rose
- Re: WG meeting structure Aaron Falk
- Re: WG meeting structure Kyle Rose
- Re: WG meeting structure Toerless Eckert
- Re: WG meeting structure Ole Troan
- Re: WG meeting structure Fred Baker
- Re: WG meeting structure Fred Baker
- RE: WG meeting structure Valery Smyslov
- Re: WG meeting structure Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: WG meeting structure Lars Eggert
- RE: WG meeting structure Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
- Re: WG meeting structure Mark Nottingham
- Re: WG meeting structure Russ Housley
- Re: WG meeting structure Ole Troan
- RE: WG meeting structure STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: WG meeting structure Mary Barnes
- Re: WG meeting structure Michael Richardson
- Re: WG meeting structure Andrew G. Malis
- Re: WG meeting structure Andrew G. Malis
- RE: WG meeting structure STARK, BARBARA H
- RE: WG meeting structure Linda Dunbar
- RE: WG meeting structure Black, David
- Re: WG meeting structure Eggert, Lars
- Re: WG meeting structure Michael Richardson
- Re: WG meeting structure Michael Richardson
- Re: WG meeting structure Andrew G. Malis
- Re: WG meeting structure Michael Richardson
- Re: WG meeting structure Michael Richardson
- RE: WG meeting structure Black, David
- Re: WG meeting structure Andrew G. Malis
- Re: WG meeting structure Pete Resnick
- Re: WG meeting structure Michael Richardson
- Re: WG meeting structure Michael Richardson
- Re: WG meeting structure Mary Barnes
- Re: WG meeting structure Mary Barnes
- Re: WG meeting structure Michael Richardson
- Re: WG meeting structure Dave Lawrence
- Re: WG meeting structure Fred Baker
- Re: WG meeting structure Loa Andersson
- Re: WG meeting structure Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: WG meeting structure Loa Andersson
- Re: WG meeting structure Fred Baker
- Re: WG meeting structure Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: WG meeting structure Loa Andersson
- Re: WG meeting structure Wes Hardaker
- Re: WG meeting structure Michael Richardson
- Managing CC List Fred Baker
- Re: WG meeting structure Toerless Eckert
- Re: Managing CC List Michael Richardson
- Re: Managing CC List Mary Barnes