Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com> Wed, 07 November 2012 23:20 UTC
Return-Path: <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4A421F8B3A for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:20:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.542
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.542 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hv4chQR7MFHq for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:20:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sabertooth02.qualcomm.com (sabertooth02.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.38]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0ED521F8ACA for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:20:56 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6889"; a="5043997"
Received: from ironmsg04-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.18]) by sabertooth02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2012 14:57:13 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,732,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="421585191"
Received: from nasanexhc08.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.39.7]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 07 Nov 2012 15:20:39 -0800
Received: from dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org (172.30.39.5) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.39.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.1; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:20:38 -0800
Message-ID: <p06240618ccc09c0caf8c@dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <509AE875.7080506@lacnic.net>
References: <CCBED4DE.84702%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <CABmDk8ktwFgNizWMfpCcOjp5cQTZPmY1YqZN378SXG2JYYeQsA@mail.gmail.com> <p0624060accc07206eb84@dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org> <4726799E-AE7F-4F8A-BE18-BF12628FAD42@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|bca1975b03e8a3958435eab71238b5c7oA6Kux03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|472 6799E-AE7F-4F8A-BE18-BF12628FAD42@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <509ACCB4.2060600@nomountain.net> <p06240612ccc08ac78ae5@dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org> <509AE875.7080506@lacnic.net>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:20:35 -0800
To: "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlos@lacnic.net>
From: Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.39.5]
Cc: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>, 85attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
X-BeenThere: 85attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 85 attendees mailing list <85attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/85attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:85attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:20:57 -0000
At 6:02 PM -0500 11/7/12, Carlos M. Martinez wrote: > Cold is more manageable than hot, that is a well-known fact. That's widely accepted and oft-repeated, but I have my doubts. Personally, I find it far easier to cope with being too hot than too cold (except when trying to sleep, and then a cold room and warm blanket is good). I suspect it has to do with how much fat one has, and one's internal metabolism. > For example long haul overnight flights get usually chilly for a reason. Hah! I find long overnight flights are invariably way too hot. Most get positively broasting. I'm always overheated on planes, but too cold in meeting rooms. More proof that someone is always unhappy with the temperature :-) > No airline would provide economy fare passangers with blankets unless > there was some benefit :-) Those blankets are viral vectors and often encrusted with baby vomit, snot, and foot grime. Unless wrapped in plastic, or one is engaging in an immune-response challenge, stay away. -- Randall Gellens Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only -------------- Randomly selected tag: --------------- This fortune intentionally not included.
- [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… iuniana.oprescu
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Marcia Beaulieu
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Dean Willis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Marcia Beaulieu
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… David Lamparter
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ted Lemon
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Dean Willis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… David Lamparter
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Daryl Malas
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Michael Richardson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Pat Thaler
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Derek Atkins
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… joel jaeggli
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… cathy aronson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] [johnlevine.com-ietf] Re: are w… John Levine
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Benson Schliesser
- Re: [85attendees] [johnlevine.com-ietf] Re: are w… Simon Perreault
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ross Callon
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Tim Chown
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… JOHNSON, ALASTAIR (ALASTAIR)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Melinda Shore
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Benoit Claise
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Tim Chown
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Jon Hudson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Michael Richardson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Pat Thaler
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Melinda Shore
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Simon Perreault
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Tim Chown
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Dean Willis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ray Bellis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ