IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 06 November 2012 20:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34A721F8B19 for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 12:53:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.833
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.833 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.121, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c1+KN6QTdsGe for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 12:53:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [67.23.6.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA31021F8AF3 for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 12:52:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (dhcp-1280.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.18.128]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D90F281A9 for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 15:44:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (quigon.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9CBCA0BC for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 15:53:01 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: 85attendees@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <C1003FE0-D471-4A17-A63A-8BBD1B21EABC@fugue.com>
References: <CCBED4DE.84702%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <50997307.3000208@alum.mit.edu> <C1003FE0-D471-4A17-A63A-8BBD1B21EABC@fugue.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> message dated "Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:33:33 -0500."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:53:01 -0500
Message-ID: <10287.1352235181@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Subject: Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
X-BeenThere: 85attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 85 attendees mailing list <85attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/85attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:85attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:53:02 -0000

On monday, in a T-shirt I froze in Salon C, at the WG table.

I was not cold outside in said T-shirt.  I ran at 6am this morning in
shorts, in the rain, and I wasn't cold.  Today, I'm in long sleeves, and
I'm okay.

The hotels all seem to err on the side of making us too cold.
I'd rather they erred a bit on the other side.  Too bad IoT can't
collect data from all our devices, watches, etc... :-)

-- 
Michael Richardson
-on the road-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email