Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?

Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com> Wed, 07 November 2012 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC39A21F8B96; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 12:25:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fZiO+E9yOPIh; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 12:25:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sabertooth02.qualcomm.com (sabertooth02.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.38]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466B121F8B6E; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 12:25:44 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6888"; a="4938987"
Received: from ironmsg04-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.18]) by sabertooth02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2012 12:02:17 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,732,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="421466569"
Received: from nasanexhc07.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.39.190]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 07 Nov 2012 12:25:43 -0800
Received: from dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org (172.30.39.5) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.39.190) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.1; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 12:25:42 -0800
Message-ID: <p0624060accc07206eb84@dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABmDk8ktwFgNizWMfpCcOjp5cQTZPmY1YqZN378SXG2JYYeQsA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CCBED4DE.84702%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <CABmDk8ktwFgNizWMfpCcOjp5cQTZPmY1YqZN378SXG2JYYeQsA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:17:41 -0800
To: Mary Barnes <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>, jordi.palet@consulintel.es
From: Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.39.5]
Cc: 85attendees@ietf.org, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
X-BeenThere: 85attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 85 attendees mailing list <85attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/85attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:85attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 20:25:45 -0000

At 2:51 PM -0600 11/6/12, Mary Barnes wrote:

>  We have this same discussion every meeting.

Indeed.  People's preferences vary a great deal, but also, IETFers 
tend to be different from the usual meeting crowds; they are more 
likely to wear suits while we are more likely to wear T-shirts and 
even shorts/sandals.  So, in general, meeting rooms are more likely 
to be tuned for the suit-types than the T-shirt types.

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
The chance of forgetting something is directly proportional
to.....to........uh..............