IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Wed, 07 November 2012 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3622721F8A17; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 12:57:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7+vO22B8a7Dy; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 12:57:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674B921F89B3; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 12:57:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost.ecs.soton.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qA7KuxHf015440; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 20:56:59 GMT
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk qA7KuxHf015440
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=200903; t=1352321820; bh=1ydtNGFbIQJXJPKFbdUwE5qEDIs=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=F4Uw0hfxghVmtzS7YQAyUuap9t6RuuzFnViNSgVvqm2zMHm12kFIzNakigLQ7m74b cLdzmI5W9qc4n90goVsi58qIVw0P8A7owxIqatiqh0RuAcnnR7oiKITKYQs0Nh9jaC 0UiR58RGslrLcJuvv4RW+Yoo6JDlbAyAgVZnXRPw=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25d]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id oA6Kux0430613243sB ret-id none; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 20:57:00 +0000
Received: from dhcp-1343.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-1343.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.19.67]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qA7KtdH0017893 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 20:55:40 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <p0624060accc07206eb84@dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 20:55:39 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EMEW3|bca1975b03e8a3958435eab71238b5c7oA6Kux03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4726799E-AE7F-4F8A-BE18-BF12628FAD42@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <CCBED4DE.84702%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <CABmDk8ktwFgNizWMfpCcOjp5cQTZPmY1YqZN378SXG2JYYeQsA@mail.gmail.com> <p0624060accc07206eb84@dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org> <4726799E-AE7F-4F8A-BE18-BF12628FAD42@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=oA6Kux043061324300; tid=oA6Kux0430613243sB; client=relay,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=5:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: qA7KuxHf015440
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Cc: 85attendees@ietf.org, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat@ietf.org>, Mary Barnes <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>, jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Subject: Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
X-BeenThere: 85attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 85 attendees mailing list <85attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/85attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:85attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 20:57:05 -0000

On 7 Nov 2012, at 20:17, Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:

> At 2:51 PM -0600 11/6/12, Mary Barnes wrote:
> 
>> We have this same discussion every meeting.
> 
> Indeed.  People's preferences vary a great deal, but also, IETFers tend to be different from the usual meeting crowds; they are more likely to wear suits while we are more likely to wear T-shirts and even shorts/sandals.  So, in general, meeting rooms are more likely to be tuned for the suit-types than the T-shirt types.

So next IETF let's give out sweatshirts not T-shirts ;)

Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email