Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net> Wed, 07 November 2012 23:29 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
X-Original-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEEF21F8B80 for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:29:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cQYPxkWKsopK for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:29:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a71.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdccah.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.207]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BB321F8B65 for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:29:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a71.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a71.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B594E42807B; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:29:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.129.21.119] (dhcp-1577.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.21.119]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: melinda.shore@nomountain.net) by homiemail-a71.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50C1242806E; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:29:16 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <509AEECB.7030105@nomountain.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:29:15 -0900
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
Organization: No Mountain Software
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>
References: <CCBED4DE.84702%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <CABmDk8ktwFgNizWMfpCcOjp5cQTZPmY1YqZN378SXG2JYYeQsA@mail.gmail.com> <p0624060accc07206eb84@dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org> <4726799E-AE7F-4F8A-BE18-BF12628FAD42@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|bca1975b03e8a3958435eab71238b5c7oA6Kux03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|472 6799E-AE7F-4F8A-BE18-BF12628FAD42@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <509ACCB4.2060600@nomountain.net> <p06240612ccc08ac78ae5@dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org> <509AE875.7080506@lacnic.net> <p06240618ccc09c0caf8c@dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <p06240618ccc09c0caf8c@dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 85attendees@ietf.org, "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlos@lacnic.net>
Subject: Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
X-BeenThere: 85attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 85 attendees mailing list <85attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/85attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:85attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:29:18 -0000

On 11/7/2012 2:20 PM, Randall Gellens wrote:
> That's widely accepted and oft-repeated, but I have my doubts.
> Personally, I find it far easier to cope with being too hot than too
> cold (except when trying to sleep, and then a cold room and warm blanket
> is good).  I suspect it has to do with how much fat one has, and one's
> internal metabolism.

I'm pretty sure that arguing from anecdote isn't going to be
particularly productive.  I live in interior Alaska and the
morning temperatures this week have been in the neighborhood
of -30F, not rising during the day above -10F.  We have weeks
during each winter in which temperatures don't rise above -40.
"What one person can do, another can do."

The issue in the Hilton seems to be that there's a lot of
variability from spot to spot, not that the temperatures are
outside "normal" ranges.  This is easily dealt with by layering,
as Mary suggested.

Melinda