IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 07 November 2012 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D46421F8C67 for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:12:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.097, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3-ZSWpc6ZBV3 for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:12:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (av-tac-rtp.cisco.com [64.102.19.209]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE9321F8C63 for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:12:58 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from rooster.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qA7LCvAK005537; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 16:12:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.82.217.31] (rtp-vpn3-285.cisco.com [10.82.217.31]) by rooster.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qA7LCvQO002892; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 16:12:57 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <509ACEDA.4030508@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:12:58 -0500
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
References: <CCBED4DE.84702%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <CABmDk8ktwFgNizWMfpCcOjp5cQTZPmY1YqZN378SXG2JYYeQsA@mail.gmail.com> <p0624060accc07206eb84@dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org> <4726799E-AE7F-4F8A-BE18-BF12628FAD42@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|bca1975b03e8a3958435eab71238b5c7oA6Kux03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4726799E-AE7F-4F8A-BE18-BF12628FAD42@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <509ACCB4.2060600@nomountain.net>
In-Reply-To: <509ACCB4.2060600@nomountain.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 85attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
X-BeenThere: 85attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 85 attendees mailing list <85attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/85attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:85attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 21:12:59 -0000

> On 11/7/2012 11:55 AM, Tim Chown wrote:
>> So next IETF let's give out sweatshirts not T-shirts ;)
> I don't fully understand the kvetching about this.  You (the
> generic "you") know that you're coming to a meeting in the US
> and that Americans overdo air conditioning, and then you're
> surprised the rooms are chilly and you're unprepared for it?
> Really?
+1

Regards, Benoit

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email