IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Tue, 06 November 2012 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D877921F8615 for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:08:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iFgU6l1eyW41 for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:08:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe2d:43:76:96:30:32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6802621F8606 for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:08:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.43]) by qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id LEMl1k0020vp7WLA3M8xcn; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:08:57 +0000
Received: from dhcp-16c4.meeting.ietf.org ([IPv6:2001:df8:0:16:2863:7ce1:6229:9098]) by omta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id LM8w1k00F3ktATy8RM8wym; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:08:57 +0000
Message-ID: <50997CCB.60700@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:10:35 -0500
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 85attendees@ietf.org
References: <CCBEE2FD.8474C%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
In-Reply-To: <CCBEE2FD.8474C%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
X-BeenThere: 85attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 85 attendees mailing list <85attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/85attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:85attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:08:59 -0000

On 11/6/12 3:59 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> I simply disagree, there are reasonable temperatures for everyone to have
> a mid point, and the hotel responsibility is to continuously monitor for
> it, and no need to wait for a complain. They get paid for doing the work
> correctly, not for waiting until we complain.
>
> I agree with some deviations in temperature, but in the SALON C and around
> is always freezing.

So, what is the magic number? 68, 70, 72? (Farenheit)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email