Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Tue, 06 November 2012 20:59 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=16571beafe=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F317D21F8AFC for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 12:59:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.732
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.732 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.867, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OaCb8U82fK-D for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 12:59:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [213.172.48.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08E721F8ACB for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 12:59:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1352235168; x=1352839968; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:CC:Message-ID: Thread-Topic:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=Y9buo+j1EkAmzkGFMzSf4P/d/ lqY5f3sJj8HJgD1sZI=; b=IZHJqosK34JQQXldpjU0djp6TxOMhkXLBep1LWg1R 1l8x9D7wrqzymA/tT8/gef8pChgkTulpa07BZoP4p0mJp58m0kRVMXT8ofNyTMu1 zldI0LVRDBVsrl2Cc18VUWVBmIPCeUn7UwIttSGs/SNANnHD+93UUwNxXQpZoTTZ sY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=st2xkJXhisNKK4uwaA5gI2Am6aH/ghcVcWxJpw+ZKbSmOQPKZxzD53vDFC72 cI5jRDaHoORYMPULK0O+8kpGBXdrOsG5DX3iPv9IOYET6W2SSDuFkDiOP mkv55CQzTSHR/DsfTmk3xh4UFKWD/uftsCC2R1ScZCrU8xvF+ShEDg=;
X-MDAV-Processed: consulintel.es, Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:52:48 +0100
Received: from [130.129.68.27] by consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50004275703.msg for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:52:48 +0100
X-Spam-Processed: consulintel.es, Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:52:48 +0100 (not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source)
X-MDPtrLookup-Result: pass dns.ptr=dhcp-441b.meeting.ietf.org (ip=130.129.68.27) (consulintel.es)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:121106:md50004275703::dVLIuyNZanZHfA7P:00004eCI
X-MDRemoteIP: 130.129.68.27
X-Return-Path: prvs=16571beafe=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: 85attendees@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.4.120824
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:59:27 -0500
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: mary.h.barnes@gmail.com
Message-ID: <CCBEE2FD.8474C%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
In-Reply-To: <CABmDk8ktwFgNizWMfpCcOjp5cQTZPmY1YqZN378SXG2JYYeQsA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: 85attendees@ietf.org, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
X-BeenThere: 85attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
List-Id: IETF 85 attendees mailing list <85attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/85attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:85attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:59:44 -0000
I simply disagree, there are reasonable temperatures for everyone to have a mid point, and the hotel responsibility is to continuously monitor for it, and no need to wait for a complain. They get paid for doing the work correctly, not for waiting until we complain. I agree with some deviations in temperature, but in the SALON C and around is always freezing. Regards, Jordi -----Mensaje original----- De: Mary Barnes <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com> Responder a: <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com> Fecha: martes, 6 de noviembre de 2012 15:51 Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> CC: <85attendees@ietf.org>, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat@ietf.org> Asunto: Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ? >We have this same discussion every meeting. Feeling cold is totally >subjective. One can always put on more clothing (I have a very warm >pashmina that I can lend someone) but most of us would prefer not to >take off too much clothing ourselves nor have others do so. So, it's >much easier for an individual to solve the too cold problem on their >own than to make all the people that aren't too cold even warmer. I >have a sweater that I have taken off and on over the past two days as >I have moved between rooms of various temperatures. I did use my >pashmina in one meeting on Sunday, but I was wearing a skirt, so was >more easily chilled than normal. Also, there is hot beverages >during breaks which are nice when one is feeling chilly. > >Mary. > >On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:53 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ ><jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote: >> As usual, the hotel air condition is extremely cool. >> >> Is the hotel or the IETF going to pay for the medical and leave >>expenses ? >> >> This is in addition against the planet conservation, WASTING energy all >> day around. >> >> Regards, >> Jordi >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ********************************************** >> IPv4 is over >> Are you ready for the new Internet ? >> http://www.consulintel.es >> The IPv6 Company >> >> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or >>confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the >>individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be >>aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents >>of this information, including attached files, is prohibited. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 85attendees mailing list >> 85attendees@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees >_______________________________________________ >85attendees mailing list >85attendees@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
- [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… iuniana.oprescu
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Marcia Beaulieu
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Dean Willis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Marcia Beaulieu
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… David Lamparter
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ted Lemon
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Dean Willis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… David Lamparter
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Daryl Malas
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Michael Richardson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Pat Thaler
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Derek Atkins
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… joel jaeggli
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… cathy aronson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] [johnlevine.com-ietf] Re: are w… John Levine
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Benson Schliesser
- Re: [85attendees] [johnlevine.com-ietf] Re: are w… Simon Perreault
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ross Callon
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Tim Chown
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… JOHNSON, ALASTAIR (ALASTAIR)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Melinda Shore
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Benoit Claise
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Tim Chown
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Jon Hudson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Michael Richardson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Pat Thaler
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Melinda Shore
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Simon Perreault
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Tim Chown
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Dean Willis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ray Bellis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ