[85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Tue, 06 November 2012 19:54 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=16571beafe=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FABD21F8AAA for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:54:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wAuz9F8R2ceD for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:54:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [213.172.48.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E5E21F8AB5 for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:53:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1352231198; x=1352835998; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=lzidJKwWipTQcJaUQhTNmGsQxxzqTjgkQDZPSHGx8iw=; b=LeLnK2s8xRGu/ YzfqW9/DKxmBbEhnkuzU1f1EORO3dIUMmcdmyZXbGaVQtlSg/w6OQyE+8TVoizoK px81o2YU+jq+I7EQniO+o/jac/aR96IjK/a+ev00RRsZV2ii4zWmGThpczAzdAG2 ZmZuULBTsD4OYNVR2EHWe1fI47BX3A=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=aohUrweh98vBFCHTLor3C0UVNQCP0Ki+jg0N2RG/l7aas7Ldkuj2yLPaQEQI oKsv7E4HOGoVUrbMut5H9KnM+n/ETmNGBKM3zWM/20Anz5MJ7lM7UuRwL y2LuZCse13IEgvMUjRLRcppgdNwY+Uy7xMEswnxhHHG4D3X09lOeOs=;
X-MDAV-Processed: consulintel.es, Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:46:38 +0100
Received: from [130.129.80.151] by consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50004275629.msg for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:46:37 +0100
X-Spam-Processed: consulintel.es, Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:46:37 +0100 (not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source)
X-MDPtrLookup-Result: pass dns.ptr=dhcp-5097.meeting.ietf.org (ip=130.129.80.151) (consulintel.es)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:121106:md50004275629::u0XJF+2AtbwlIt4D:00002izp
X-MDRemoteIP: 130.129.80.151
X-Return-Path: prvs=16571beafe=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: 85attendees@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.4.120824
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 14:53:18 -0500
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: 85attendees@ietf.org, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <CCBED4DE.84702%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
X-BeenThere: 85attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
List-Id: IETF 85 attendees mailing list <85attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/85attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:85attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 19:54:39 -0000
As usual, the hotel air condition is extremely cool. Is the hotel or the IETF going to pay for the medical and leave expenses ? This is in addition against the planet conservation, WASTING energy all day around. Regards, Jordi ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
- [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… iuniana.oprescu
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Marcia Beaulieu
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Dean Willis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Marcia Beaulieu
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… David Lamparter
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ted Lemon
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Dean Willis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… David Lamparter
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Daryl Malas
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Michael Richardson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Pat Thaler
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Derek Atkins
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… joel jaeggli
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… cathy aronson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] [johnlevine.com-ietf] Re: are w… John Levine
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Benson Schliesser
- Re: [85attendees] [johnlevine.com-ietf] Re: are w… Simon Perreault
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ross Callon
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Tim Chown
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… JOHNSON, ALASTAIR (ALASTAIR)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Melinda Shore
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Benoit Claise
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Tim Chown
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Jon Hudson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Michael Richardson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Pat Thaler
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Melinda Shore
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Simon Perreault
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Tim Chown
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Dean Willis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ray Bellis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ