IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?

Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com> Wed, 07 November 2012 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457AB21F8433 for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 14:28:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.537
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.537 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.062, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xFwY1siVvAjw for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 14:28:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com (sabertooth01.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3BA21F8460 for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 14:04:39 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6889"; a="5023092"
Received: from ironmsg04-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.18]) by sabertooth01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2012 13:50:03 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,732,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="421542633"
Received: from nasanexhc07.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.39.190]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 07 Nov 2012 14:04:38 -0800
Received: from dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org (172.30.39.5) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.39.190) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.1; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 14:04:37 -0800
Message-ID: <p06240612ccc08ac78ae5@dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <509ACCB4.2060600@nomountain.net>
References: <CCBED4DE.84702%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <CABmDk8ktwFgNizWMfpCcOjp5cQTZPmY1YqZN378SXG2JYYeQsA@mail.gmail.com> <p0624060accc07206eb84@dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org> <4726799E-AE7F-4F8A-BE18-BF12628FAD42@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|bca1975b03e8a3958435eab71238b5c7oA6Kux03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|472 6799E-AE7F-4F8A-BE18-BF12628FAD42@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <509ACCB4.2060600@nomountain.net>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:04:35 -0800
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>, 85attendees@ietf.org
From: Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.39.5]
Subject: Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
X-BeenThere: 85attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 85 attendees mailing list <85attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/85attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:85attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:28:42 -0000

Personally, I'm delighted that the complaints are "too cold" rather 
than "so smokey I'm choking" (or "I have a concussion from being hit 
by a cookie.")

At 12:03 PM -0900 11/7/12, Melinda Shore wrote:

>  On 11/7/2012 11:55 AM, Tim Chown wrote:
>>  So next IETF let's give out sweatshirts not T-shirts ;)
>
>  I don't fully understand the kvetching about this.  You (the
>  generic "you") know that you're coming to a meeting in the US
>  and that Americans overdo air conditioning, and then you're
>  surprised the rooms are chilly and you're unprepared for it?
>  Really?
>
>  Melinda
>  _______________________________________________
>  85attendees mailing list
>  85attendees@ietf.org
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees


-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
Every successful person has had failures but repeated failure is no
guarantee of eventual success.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email