IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?

"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> Tue, 06 November 2012 21:09 UTC

Return-Path: <bs7652@att.com>
X-Original-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE4B21F8606 for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:09:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GCv9261dZsb2 for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:09:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com [209.65.160.86]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2016921F84BA for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:09:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown [144.160.20.146] (EHLO mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) by nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-6.11.0-12) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 57c79905.0.884346.00-297.2427819.nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com (envelope-from <bs7652@att.com>); Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:09:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 50997c764ed8e472-101fd6f7a2787c6dcbb61802558e00d6100e30fd
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA6L99gA019887; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 16:09:09 -0500
Received: from sflint03.pst.cso.att.com (sflint03.pst.cso.att.com [144.154.234.230]) by mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA6L8pIQ019338 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Nov 2012 16:08:59 -0500
Received: from GAALPA1MSGHUB9A.ITServices.sbc.com (gaalpa1msghub9a.itservices.sbc.com [130.8.36.87]) by sflint03.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor); Tue, 6 Nov 2012 16:08:13 -0500
Received: from GAALPA1MSGUSR9L.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.8.36.69]) by GAALPA1MSGHUB9A.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.8.36.87]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 16:08:12 -0500
From: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "85attendees@ietf.org" <85attendees@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
Thread-Index: AQHNvFiiiiwWiW80hESLaMdZgQb2A5fdlc+AgAABS4CAAAVxgP//rhpw
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:08:11 +0000
Message-ID: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6112F5C69B1@GAALPA1MSGUSR9L.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <CCBED4DE.84702%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <50997307.3000208@alum.mit.edu> <C1003FE0-D471-4A17-A63A-8BBD1B21EABC@fugue.com> <10287.1352235181@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <10287.1352235181@sandelman.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.70.36.81]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <bs7652@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.20.146]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=Na1RIR/4 c=1 sm=0 a=Qs8R1XBwmid1qBFB/a8mmA==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=fqLz1q0H6ZEA:10 a=_YY8JV3nc4EA:10 a=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=BLc]
X-AnalysisOut: [eEmwcHowA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32R]
X-AnalysisOut: [AAAA:8 a=vuE81G82qUgA:10 a=UMDanfBrkuAq_37TFk4A:9 a=CjuIK1]
X-AnalysisOut: [q_8ugA:10]
Subject: Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
X-BeenThere: 85attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 85 attendees mailing list <85attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/85attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:85attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:09:11 -0000

> The hotels all seem to err on the side of making us too cold.
> I'd rather they erred a bit on the other side.  

People don't tend to emit odors when they're too cold.
Having been in a too-warm room of packed people in the past, I'm very appreciative of the hotel's erring in the "cold" direction.
People also are less likely to fall asleep during presentations. 
Barbara

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email