Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
Daryl Malas <D.Malas@cablelabs.com> Tue, 06 November 2012 20:39 UTC
Return-Path: <D.Malas@cablelabs.com>
X-Original-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5AD21F8963 for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 12:39:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.228, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qxWms7xuCNBB for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 12:39:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ondar.cablelabs.com (ondar.cablelabs.com [192.160.73.61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453A721F88F8 for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 12:39:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kyzyl.cablelabs.com (kyzyl [10.253.0.7]) by ondar.cablelabs.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA6Kceax026016; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:38:41 -0700
Received: from exchange.cablelabs.com (10.5.0.19) by kyzyl.cablelabs.com (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/407/kyzyl.cablelabs.com); Tue, 06 Nov 2012 13:38:40 -0700 (MST)
X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/407/kyzyl.cablelabs.com)
Received: from EXCHANGE.cablelabs.com ([fe80::797a:96d1:3c53:18ee]) by EXCHANGE.cablelabs.com ([fe80::797a:96d1:3c53:18ee%11]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:38:41 -0700
From: Daryl Malas <D.Malas@cablelabs.com>
To: David Lamparter <equinox-ietf@diac24.net>, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Thread-Topic: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
Thread-Index: AQHNvFiZWZseKIq99UaBw1J7tHUqrZfdt1aAgAAA0QD//64WgA==
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:38:41 +0000
Message-ID: <CCBEDF4A.291C%d.malas@cablelabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121106203150.GM1927048@jupiter.n2.diac24.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.4.120824
x-originating-ip: [10.5.0.27]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <98521DF6DA17A842AB1FB42A1369E90C@cablelabs.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Approved: ondar
Cc: "85attendees@ietf.org" <85attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
X-BeenThere: 85attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 85 attendees mailing list <85attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/85attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:85attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:39:50 -0000
The IETF's goal is to keep the brightest minds well preserved. ;-) On 11/6/12 3:31 PM, "David Lamparter" <equinox-ietf@diac24.net> wrote: >On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 03:28:55PM -0500, Paul Kyzivat wrote: >> Personally I find it very pleasant inside today. >> (It was overly warm in the crowd during the cookie break.) >> >> ISTM that there are a wide range of temperature preferences. > >Let's have a hum about the temperature? >(I'm freezing, in a pullover.) > >-David > > >> On 11/6/12 2:53 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: >> > As usual, the hotel air condition is extremely cool. >> > >> > Is the hotel or the IETF going to pay for the medical and leave >>expenses ? >> > >> > This is in addition against the planet conservation, WASTING energy >>all >> > day around. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Jordi > >_______________________________________________ >85attendees mailing list >85attendees@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees
- [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… iuniana.oprescu
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Marcia Beaulieu
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Dean Willis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Marcia Beaulieu
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… David Lamparter
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ted Lemon
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Dean Willis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… David Lamparter
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Daryl Malas
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Michael Richardson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Pat Thaler
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Derek Atkins
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… joel jaeggli
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… cathy aronson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] [johnlevine.com-ietf] Re: are w… John Levine
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Benson Schliesser
- Re: [85attendees] [johnlevine.com-ietf] Re: are w… Simon Perreault
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ross Callon
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Tim Chown
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… JOHNSON, ALASTAIR (ALASTAIR)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Melinda Shore
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Benoit Claise
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Tim Chown
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Jon Hudson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Michael Richardson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Pat Thaler
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Melinda Shore
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Simon Perreault
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Tim Chown
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Dean Willis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ray Bellis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ