Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
"Carlos M. Martinez" <carlos@lacnic.net> Wed, 07 November 2012 23:02 UTC
Return-Path: <carlos@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0A121F898A for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:02:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jgMhJg8TqmMt for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:02:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD4421F89D2 for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:02:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:df8:0:16:7446:9947:e80f:60f4] (unknown [IPv6:2001:df8:0:16:7446:9947:e80f:60f4]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7384B30847D; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:02:20 -0200 (UYST)
Message-ID: <509AE875.7080506@lacnic.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:02:13 -0500
From: "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlos@lacnic.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>
References: <CCBED4DE.84702%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <CABmDk8ktwFgNizWMfpCcOjp5cQTZPmY1YqZN378SXG2JYYeQsA@mail.gmail.com> <p0624060accc07206eb84@dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org> <4726799E-AE7F-4F8A-BE18-BF12628FAD42@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|bca1975b03e8a3958435eab71238b5c7oA6Kux03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|472 6799E-AE7F-4F8A-BE18-BF12628FAD42@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <509ACCB4.2060600@nomountain.net> <p06240612ccc08ac78ae5@dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <p06240612ccc08ac78ae5@dhcp-4049.meeting.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: carlos@lacnic.net
Cc: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>, 85attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers ?
X-BeenThere: 85attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 85 attendees mailing list <85attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/85attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:85attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:02:27 -0000
+1 Cold is more manageable than hot, that is a well-known fact. For example long haul overnight flights get usually chilly for a reason. No airline would provide economy fare passangers with blankets unless there was some benefit :-) ~Carlos On 11/7/2012 5:04 PM, Randall Gellens wrote: > Personally, I'm delighted that the complaints are "too cold" rather > than "so smokey I'm choking" (or "I have a concussion from being hit > by a cookie.") > > At 12:03 PM -0900 11/7/12, Melinda Shore wrote: > >> On 11/7/2012 11:55 AM, Tim Chown wrote: >>> So next IETF let's give out sweatshirts not T-shirts ;) >> >> I don't fully understand the kvetching about this. You (the >> generic "you") know that you're coming to a meeting in the US >> and that Americans overdo air conditioning, and then you're >> surprised the rooms are chilly and you're unprepared for it? >> Really? >> >> Melinda >> _______________________________________________ >> 85attendees mailing list >> 85attendees@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees > >
- [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or freezers… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… iuniana.oprescu
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Marcia Beaulieu
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Dean Willis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Marcia Beaulieu
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… David Lamparter
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ted Lemon
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Dean Willis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… David Lamparter
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Daryl Malas
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Michael Richardson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Pat Thaler
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Derek Atkins
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… joel jaeggli
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… cathy aronson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] [johnlevine.com-ietf] Re: are w… John Levine
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Benson Schliesser
- Re: [85attendees] [johnlevine.com-ietf] Re: are w… Simon Perreault
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ross Callon
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Tim Chown
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… JOHNSON, ALASTAIR (ALASTAIR)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Melinda Shore
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Benoit Claise
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Tim Chown
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Jon Hudson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Michael Richardson
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Pat Thaler
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Mary Barnes
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Melinda Shore
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Simon Perreault
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Tim Chown
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Dean Willis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Randall Gellens
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ray Bellis
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [85attendees] are we in meeting rooms or free… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ