Re: [apps-discuss] font/*

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 09 November 2011 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A7121F8496 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 13:11:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.576
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g5+uY5aU5mua for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 13:11:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C01921F8495 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 13:11:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from normz.cisco.com (unknown [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81D8941FC7; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:17:08 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4EBAEC6E.2040405@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 14:11:10 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
References: <4EB86078.8070904@stpeter.im> <BDC0F178EEB88CC4B3D24020@PST.JCK.COM> <4EB8D0F4.9020907@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <24FBF40353ABCC3A4F15E82B@PST.JCK.COM> <56B202FE-ED81-4C36-AB4C-0A809F51D009@standardstrack.com> <FFB42B3B968A7202317BD55C@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <FFB42B3B968A7202317BD55C@PST.JCK.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] font/*
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:11:12 -0000

On 11/9/11 2:07 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
>
>
> --On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 16:00 -0500 Eric Burger
> <eburger@standardstrack.com>  wrote:
>
>> Sounds like a call for a BOF.
>
> Only if we can get some serious typographic folks there.
> Otherwise, I'd personally prefer to see a few I-Ds.  Since there
> is no change of getting a BOF together before next week, some
> documents on which the community could base decisions would have
> a chance of being a lot faster, too.

Documents are good. I'll reach out to folks at the W3C to see if someone 
who's involved in the Web Open Font Format work might be able to put 
some energy into these discussions.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/