Re: [apps-discuss] font/*

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sun, 13 November 2011 10:11 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F83F21F8B56 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:11:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.789, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Ck9+yowWR2c for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:11:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 486D521F8B49 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:11:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2011 10:11:30 -0000
Received: from p5DCCAC94.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [93.204.172.148] by mail.gmx.net (mp014) with SMTP; 13 Nov 2011 11:11:30 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+CpRJkWbeCKd94JrmzxVoLACsf9GlzzpcPMDYsQ/ z7HuKhGadc+dkl
Message-ID: <4EBF97CF.6030204@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:11:27 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
References: <4EB86078.8070904@stpeter.im> <BDC0F178EEB88CC4B3D24020@PST.JCK.COM> <4EB8D0F4.9020907@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <555BA718-A5FA-4111-9A8B-1DE99921CCE2@standardstrack.com> <60D34A5D-985C-4C97-A4FA-3CBF5CD31FCF@mnot.net> <4EB9D49C.5010100@it.aoyama.ac.jp><4EBB2FEA.5060602@dcrocker.net> <4EBB50F4.7020501@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4EBB54E0.9090005@dcrocker.net> <00bb01cc9f87$ff24b9a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <4EBBABC1.1010101@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <003201cca12e$1f35f860$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <4EBF15DD.4050801@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EBF15DD.4050801@att.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] font/*
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:11:32 -0000

On 2011-11-13 01:57, Tony Hansen wrote:
> ...
> *IF* we were to define a top-level media type, I do *not* think it
> should be named "font", but instead should name it "fontformat" or
> something like that. I think naming it "font" just leads people to have
> false expectations.
> ...

Doesn't this also argue for "imageformat" and "videoformat"?

Best regards, Julian