Re: [apps-discuss] font/*

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Mon, 14 November 2011 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF0111E8334 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:16:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.144
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.144 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.445, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aykK3ulJEHtW for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:16:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F7D11E8332 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:16:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01O8ENPJYBAO018FHF@mauve.mrochek.com> for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:16:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01O8DV7Q11A800RCTX@mauve.mrochek.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:16:23 -0800 (PST)
Message-id: <01O8ENPHIUAQ00RCTX@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:13:29 -0800 (PST)
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:31:34 +0900" <4EC0C3D6.1070506@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; Format=flowed
References: <4EB86078.8070904@stpeter.im> <BDC0F178EEB88CC4B3D24020@PST.JCK.COM> <4EB8D0F4.9020907@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <555BA718-A5FA-4111-9A8B-1DE99921CCE2@standardstrack.com> <60D34A5D-985C-4C97-A4FA-3CBF5CD31FCF@mnot.net> <4EB9D49C.5010100@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4EBB2FEA.5060602@dcrocker.net> <4EBB50F4.7020501@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4EBB54E0.9090005@dcrocker.net> <00bb01cc9f87$ff24b9a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <4EBBABC1.1010101@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <003201cca12e$1f35f860$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <4EC0C3D6.1070506@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
To: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] font/*
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:16:37 -0000

> Hello Tom, others,

> On 2011/11/12 20:27, t.petch wrote:

> > But more significantly, as other posts have clarified for me, this thread
> > is nothing to do with fonts but with type definition languages, so perhaps
> > it should be 'type/*'.

> Perhaps it should be type/* or fontformat/* or whatever. But most
> probably it should be font/. Because the people who are working on this
> repeatedly have asked for font/*, and never for type/*, and never for
> fontformat/* or some such.

If that's indeed what they asked for, then +1.

				Ned