Re: [apps-discuss] font/*

"Martin J. Dürst" <> Wed, 09 November 2011 01:17 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB6B11E80AD for <>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:17:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.065
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.065 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.275, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, J_BACKHAIR_34=1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fm0QB5H266vt for <>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:17:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A94711E8095 for <>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:17:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([]) by (secret/secret) with SMTP id pA91HVBj026110 for <>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:17:31 +0900
Received: from (unknown []) by with smtp id 6627_3aae_98f70b98_0a70_11e1_89fb_001d096c566a; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:17:31 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([]:55751) by with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S156AC87> for <> from <>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:17:35 +0900
Message-ID: <>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:17:16 +0900
From: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv: Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Nottingham <>
References: <> <BDC0F178EEB88CC4B3D24020@PST.JCK.COM> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: " Discuss" <>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] font/*
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 01:17:34 -0000

On 2011/11/09 2:15, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Oh, I had thought it would be
>    font/PostScript
>    font/TrueType
> i.e., NOT identifying the specific typeface in use. After all, we don't have text/html/home-page, do we?

It's definitely that.

(which requires some serious rewriting around security issues, but 
otherwise is recommended reading for people who want to comment in this 

    This document defines a top-level MIME type "font" under which
    differing representation formats of fonts may be registered (e.g. a
    bitmap or outline format).  It should be emphasized that, just as
    under the "image" top-level type one does not find registration for,
    for example, "The Night-watch" (by Rembrandt) but instead "JPEG" (an
    image representation system), so, under "font" one will not find
    "Courier" (the name of a popular font) but perhaps "BDF" (the name of
    a commonly used bitmap font format).

> BTW, before naming this thing, please have a discussion with a typographer about the difference between a "font" and a "typeface."
> (My wife, who teaches typography, would beat me if I didn't make that distinction) explains that in very 
simple terms. As far as the analogy there with MP3<=>font, 
song<=>typeface goes, we definitely need Mime types for fonts, not for 

Regards,   Martin.