IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] font/*

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 10 November 2011 01:59 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76A41F0C3E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:59:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.538
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.538 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_BACKHAIR_34=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_RECV_IP_061228=0.895, SARE_RECV_SPAM_DOMN0b=1.666]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YMqOpMbTYp6U for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:59:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43401F0C34 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:59:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.229] (61-230-51-213.dynamic.hinet.net [61.230.51.213]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAA1x85R005379 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:59:16 -0800
Message-ID: <4EBB2FEA.5060602@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:59:06 +0800
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <4EB86078.8070904@stpeter.im> <BDC0F178EEB88CC4B3D24020@PST.JCK.COM> <4EB8D0F4.9020907@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <555BA718-A5FA-4111-9A8B-1DE99921CCE2@standardstrack.com> <60D34A5D-985C-4C97-A4FA-3CBF5CD31FCF@mnot.net> <4EB9D49C.5010100@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <4EB9D49C.5010100@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:59:16 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] font/*
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 01:59:20 -0000

> http://fontfeed.com/archives/font-or-typeface/ explains that in very simple
> terms. As far as the analogy there with MP3<=>font, song<=>typeface goes, we
> definitely need Mime types for fonts, not for typefaces.


Forgive me for feeling the need to be entirely pedantic here, but the article 
went just shy of being completely clear (for me) and I think it is indeed worth 
having us all not merely on the same page, but the same place on the page...

Is this correct:

    Typeface:  times roman

    Font:      times roman, 12pt

    Font:      times roman, 10pt

    Font:      times roman, 10pt, italic

    Font:      times roman, 10pt, bold

Yes?

That is, typeface is the basic design (or abstraction) while typeface + physical 
details (such as specific size) is a font?

Tnx.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status