IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] THIS IS ABUSE (it might be)

"Eric D. Williams" <eric@infobro.com> Fri, 07 April 2023 23:47 UTC

Return-Path: <eric@infobro.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B481C14F748 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2023 16:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <UiVtH_dogfyX>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Improper folded header field made up entirely of whitespace (char 20 hex): X-Spam-Report: ...infobro.com for details. Content previ[...]
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=infobro.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UiVtH_dogfyX for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2023 16:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from diamond.home.infobro.com (green.infobro.com [208.58.75.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26AE3C14F693 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Apr 2023 16:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infobro.com; s=infobro; h=Content-Type:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version; bh=DMjhoLJMDSSCxNq/Jv/d8POg/rpCDApvxAtsRC3N3Uw=; b=DC1RWyVlXclqphIFF/wgME4/TyJdesewP9/BHHHu9F+e+btEps+LSzcCFQ4ttAZS0aO9uLOcGbsL6zwqOGqL9GvZOXwwHBT28rsfH/2geJZ07QY3h5jnuZQi1oJeduWxXdZuvclncBNQieaBnUjqK1xnV4/W57/sq2pMpgXc+W0=;
Received: from mail-qt1-f177.google.com ([209.85.160.177]) by diamond.home.infobro.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eric@infobro.com>) id 1pkvnz-0002T4-35 for dmarc@ietf.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2023 23:47:44 +0000
Received: by mail-qt1-f177.google.com with SMTP id x17so19762029qtv.7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Apr 2023 16:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9eDjXVsqdY12Xe+iHH64+lq/p9u3+3XQVf+OMJ8r0a3wQAajkXQ zPEXBm9SFPwvgBY+BJ3a0qcBBB/Lajfg++3Qm8w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350bw+HPYEKkQ8SvZSd2lVuk0IXSMm2qQbPDRjv5A9z6beEiyKPPPd3f2Ebtl2sYvzjJc2DY1zV2f6FoSHZTIcEE=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1a11:b0:3da:1712:608e with SMTP id f17-20020a05622a1a1100b003da1712608emr1330923qtb.11.1680911262405; Fri, 07 Apr 2023 16:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Eric D. Williams" <eric@infobro.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2023 19:47:30 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAKMzGW6x=nMyvFU=Bi-sbz-qPiSNGa22BWu11SMcZphHeZUjtw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKMzGW6x=nMyvFU=Bi-sbz-qPiSNGa22BWu11SMcZphHeZUjtw@mail.gmail.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b1dc8805f8c7a6ea"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/8176SF1MF_5HPUHrqfapDdQ0i0s>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] THIS IS ABUSE (it might be)
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2023 23:47:55 -0000

I think the reliance upon list operators is properly placed on that role.
It's not a DMARC problem, it's a DKIM problem, I think.

Eric D. Williams <eric@infobro.com>
PGP Public Key
http://new.infobro.com/KeyServ/EricDWilliams.asc
Finger Print: 1055 8AED 9783 2378 73EF  7B19 0544 A590 FF65 B789

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email