IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 31 March 2023 00:46 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BD3C14CE4B for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7BBRvOGeUjZh for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com (mail-ed1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CF3FC15152B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id i5so83746703eda.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680223580; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QFCyGIyuuIwQPWD+wma0eQzz+BfU2HBbgcBDC8D/+k4=; b=apWRAyBoKOsJGH5iktnLyS62IkRP5X6zDiii6b4TmdLQCIIJX0VfvgImtUcjQv0XZn 3JicSKsGk/Ns+vZ/TnerAdFSdysYX/Iq51DcC579zpw5q2TM/TApbvaoTpcIcCwloRtH JLDyAtlvip7SH3fQHITGOJwuGsMNW+D7rN+03M4OAnQDXFTANuBgAUsW0lDgvJQ9K9Hu eEVOiNE20yPr7LMWIZ6Ws2uekgpVT39f6NW6G/U55vk9R2RnzVm5gMkkQ1OPZZxM3zcK B+FjwBYrjwr9f0hlR/UE6nLxTlwAKQmIdi7UvjTZ4CC8bIRIIECudT9n2t8MOGOcrpUw DQnw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680223580; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QFCyGIyuuIwQPWD+wma0eQzz+BfU2HBbgcBDC8D/+k4=; b=3ja84XaIa609xOkVcdjMR4KPYZB0zF8erA8TvHnKVqZs2fdR+eieAmULmKntUY7EdF 3IKdhEK9C5zInifppmyv4Ze5RuXWYlA4GftnnGDKb70JvLY3EXKaHm2KM5BrlBBFA2HA BKJuoq5525WRVdesNi5SPwHPtINPfMQS6i4UArmIWQ86Sh+icYWKC7qmualxkBeQRJ3r h2y0NxWXoHc6R2soKeAj2U3L2HR45mOameO+xOkJECpM51dMsWfCDzZJSUuI27xrAaui G7tHJpuUu76/vFHRa/qoTZ7Pm9X0qHHUYzhcp+LWLGKwUS/o/3DOJLY4p3ejXXhphBrd YedQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9eLcGiNTpWL994El/2oHgC74q8g40+PurrcBunN2XNm0udyKsP2 vw8+vj0u3xLJwj2Ei1Gou18zn6jKFlUBTZcyqCeUoS/A1TWTFQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350bz9SI7wMbf7S4qrb+WelOPT1Vp13/flKuoeTjQ2/JO1Xf8PLU6Ecb8EdmmLOXeaayrEjQt760A0jPwBboG238=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:d543:0:b0:4fb:f19:87f with SMTP id f3-20020a50d543000000b004fb0f19087fmr12883273edj.3.1680223580560; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJ+NBg9vzqa0_t-sBf7EKXQ3A=DTyy-Vc7M-ZK9-vfJxmw@mail.gmail.com> <6319292.vCqnBZbX7o@localhost> <CAHej_8nd1xyAgwASLJbuJHyXEAfHbjqxNH1XtJxKFyfyOneyug@mail.gmail.com> <13145172.pEV04Z3DvM@localhost> <CAHej_8msLJQ0vbZ2jzitjxrQ1wdim5bHJkiD-QrU5F0EJvQp0g@mail.gmail.com> <FCFEB95E-63F9-46C3-A5F4-FA6B02FA8EB5@episteme.net> <CAHej_8=GbmzyXaeEkyLkv6uKc0-owuMC6UspPNq9irT7nF8b7w@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJLmRyyBLE7ZKy88XUS_hXr9M2uwc8jOCYBrBPeC+pCdCg@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB43519A6CD95E5C80AA1EC2CFF7899@MN2PR11MB4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <13603D87-4FDE-4768-9712-E6DB0818C802@kitterman.com> <CAH48ZfztW4OFm+ZMV=et7+uczj49dfbYT7i0w4LgU7pswuiEnw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwayTG_M1-fSTXiaVM5TS1Vo7X+Ehov2Bov9vCak7gn=yg@mail.gmail.com> <CAH48ZfxejSxbsDpgBUcfMDhGcz0QLGZEH6yVRMC0xmEFLksw3w@mail.gmail.com> <06B6084E-A0C2-4E36-8B3A-EC2DFDD9D67B@episteme.net> <CAH48ZfzdZP0Gb+k_cBERWwgrJODL_GNER4ZOYxDfOS9iH8Twvg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH48ZfzdZP0Gb+k_cBERWwgrJODL_GNER4ZOYxDfOS9iH8Twvg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 09:46:08 +0900
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaGe3kSdqNU8ZVuapS1kKrhLABvD++B0+0+_ogNuj8=zw@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a99f3905f827890d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/rKgwXLcPGjkvcWBsFnQwZVHRrbo>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:46:23 -0000

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 7:51 PM Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would be happy with p=signed, because that is what p=reject means, and
> it is our job is to ensure that people interpret the signal correctly.
>

Quoting the charter:

"The working group will seek to preserve interoperability with the
installed base of DMARC systems, and provide detailed justification for any
non-interoperability."

Changing one of the valid "p=" values seems to me to be the opposite of
"preserve interoperability with the installed base", so the bar is high to
make this change.

Can the problem you're trying to address be handled in any other way?  Say,
improved informational prose?

-MSK, participating

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email