IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 31 March 2023 03:28 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349BAC151B33 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ao966batuXzz for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF3ADC151B2C for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id eg48so84444951edb.13 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680233334; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3MQhnhqpilCIG6Ifq8UjUKgyJWUtLC+z477hEm/sQxo=; b=UktyiwW8nXYou0H2uQD1uAY7BdDkeCCyt+vf085Ql82+G8nsHOf6DOcKfcPTVJn7Ax JTy7MjMG08ubqTqVTZECEhz6tJANAWe5MyLDCehTRKGjU+GNJ+ohtQIgMdb/f/JBUQak ImdShu3atslC95GtHI6Wqa4l9oFfPR3MTCL6pO8lTCVSk7IePzR0EYEQVXDQ5m20eQ4d tDH9xiRpbnRJRwpDJfAWkIyBrqNkuPjcrVZNK6YnmWtR5VCnWhGYDN4z9O6lCp3qanyD PlRyxHuBTHC+XvmBzETAY00AfGb0eaoiZl13XBzKFAyiniDYxOs4vUea6S5Fznjap3MH ajeg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680233334; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=3MQhnhqpilCIG6Ifq8UjUKgyJWUtLC+z477hEm/sQxo=; b=rvWuviItSZrEoD48QB34/4YRXI2dXM2iR2FkEsEr7o4Pnb/ZUqTeT0htEHZmz34A2o 8g4cF4n7e+gtPw5ckGELIolXDvj0BVIuviPIZXXB/vdosZdHUxT2hQoQ+k6TETLDiZz9 yv2WzmwABt6oytlm4LsOPK+0Ywqrc5ocwaW/TI34UFSCurNsS3QbohYGVociA6xTRvN/ J5GvUVnAo4J1kj31BPBT4Tr7l/FW7PvhMR6agnq5BJ1+6tJM+NbwbYOQpbNyV7pilt9l koVhcc50o2UnoQZrR7EjmwIpE29eoTUWjwIOdJwqSUkgoUrJf0UNDTBGI8muijfL0Ca+ xTUQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9fBWTy/GLKWUkFbK8dIZkCAkL4J6ixuX/CdqnJy/bN/MlPpHGKR Z39yrQIo8cwiqBZb66yyz8a0hAO1sQS5RWG7TcJH0A7I/ak=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZzJfozSYW5aB4rpFYup4z9VracJQeLv47cQc2Jz+JHZBFA9S5wZJ1CwjTFdUV9Bx0uZ4kheb22TDtg0sOu/qg=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:d412:b0:930:310:abbf with SMTP id vi18-20020a170907d41200b009300310abbfmr12693634ejc.11.1680233333878; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJ+NBg9vzqa0_t-sBf7EKXQ3A=DTyy-Vc7M-ZK9-vfJxmw@mail.gmail.com> <6319292.vCqnBZbX7o@localhost> <CAHej_8nd1xyAgwASLJbuJHyXEAfHbjqxNH1XtJxKFyfyOneyug@mail.gmail.com> <13145172.pEV04Z3DvM@localhost> <CAHej_8msLJQ0vbZ2jzitjxrQ1wdim5bHJkiD-QrU5F0EJvQp0g@mail.gmail.com> <FCFEB95E-63F9-46C3-A5F4-FA6B02FA8EB5@episteme.net> <CAHej_8=GbmzyXaeEkyLkv6uKc0-owuMC6UspPNq9irT7nF8b7w@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJLmRyyBLE7ZKy88XUS_hXr9M2uwc8jOCYBrBPeC+pCdCg@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB43519A6CD95E5C80AA1EC2CFF7899@MN2PR11MB4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <13603D87-4FDE-4768-9712-E6DB0818C802@kitterman.com> <CAH48ZfztW4OFm+ZMV=et7+uczj49dfbYT7i0w4LgU7pswuiEnw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwayTG_M1-fSTXiaVM5TS1Vo7X+Ehov2Bov9vCak7gn=yg@mail.gmail.com> <CAH48ZfxejSxbsDpgBUcfMDhGcz0QLGZEH6yVRMC0xmEFLksw3w@mail.gmail.com> <06B6084E-A0C2-4E36-8B3A-EC2DFDD9D67B@episteme.net> <CAH48ZfzdZP0Gb+k_cBERWwgrJODL_GNER4ZOYxDfOS9iH8Twvg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwaGe3kSdqNU8ZVuapS1kKrhLABvD++B0+0+_ogNuj8=zw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH48ZfyacA4HURVqFsHvLxmGvOniDKN3Sem_XOcbxbEKF-CiZA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH48ZfyacA4HURVqFsHvLxmGvOniDKN3Sem_XOcbxbEKF-CiZA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 12:28:41 +0900
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZSomM1B=J9=04EXo4UALxkUkT7PsbB7ojBOtGU3ag=tg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Douglas Foster <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000001751e05f829cfa9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/niAD9yjUfB0IQdIKfrOQDEQxWk8>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 03:28:56 -0000

On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 12:22 PM Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com> wrote:

> My point was to only restate that "signed" is the only truth that the
> DMARC policy can assert.    The new prose needs to fix the false certainty
> that the old prose created.   But until this week, the group seemed ready
> to repeat the same mistake and use language which perpetuates the myth that
> FAIL always means fraud.   Maybe, but not certainly.   The difference is
> important.
>

Do you have a specific text change you want to propose?

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email