Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows

Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com> Tue, 28 March 2023 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <todd.herr@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CE3C15270E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 13:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FmWIOSQRzltC for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 13:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com (mail-pf1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76564C1522C4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 13:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id z11so8854454pfh.4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 13:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; t=1680034870; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Bdkj/Ga35qYJOcavR6AoPzovNRYOTa35FnoxmvUvaGo=; b=XF1FawW8QIVZJ4jXbk6uxr2NVlj5V3xkdm11Sr+NA7KiCv7XP0/DdlJ8iHN/aqv8r1 GOUN16QNqxJ+rJbV0RBOOvcvq0eleDNXcvWg/f0VK3K6QIRs92zcWdeGctqcgGpa5+ot jQFECtf1K3J6SAHC4eDL25xtxu/l6sa07GA0VH6g6GeCIRd+GEuLK1QI1KulqbslZP48 E89xvL3ztlvV1ux8hDKUT3xM9iDEjr1V34VXBE7+GPrRu8onxOKUavmZ0rIAagYnRA/Y YLIwXG8MO0Pb1kfjBVNiAXpsZkPjrQdWesEFXp99sPfb3ARkcSMj4WbsP40tDWFS8rSa KuhA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680034870; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Bdkj/Ga35qYJOcavR6AoPzovNRYOTa35FnoxmvUvaGo=; b=vhOz+qZrFLZDKfmh8l8Hs3BvG7XLzNg+0ZWD63X3k8B2mNKbK2JYe4uTvdXVDzl5DK 4uoBKGcnJmpVLiWMCmq2/49AKEGME4EorDhM2vhemdrtXjOGazIBrUlcKjqR+rpyTwaW koydfwQIEQ2xENFA+Zaqkjh+QwDoWfDAw2xf6K/AAASWmQl4pbdnDh/KTz9SURjy5RwQ V0fsGEwiJ1pgMd9OvbI548CKwBraABRBW4EFOX//IUG6gpd6uswrZSP9Mp3MRa//6OkL 3c67ZjRcDvgQxG7InYJCjJIkg1uJNJnpPZnzfeIKfvFay/BYW19Y6f75aq5Xkp62EiGf 3z+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9f+njy1azotpRgjaFXjNmrBvBIeZEVC2HmRbvOcgcTTK8dpu5mk NMvuKHzZsn4ixS+Hnk+yL7iHsq2DorVOZLA/+eKgrUFlipXXuhTV
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350aniErRpPmpbj4X2nIbmrQAfPUHdF5fuONPTNsDKnHN/4XgCNhG9qPKeGPawXw/hW9iRSLLN8m2VfbFk07nOpI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:8c7:b0:625:cda5:c28c with SMTP id s7-20020a056a0008c700b00625cda5c28cmr8273798pfu.6.1680034870473; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 13:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJ+NBg9vzqa0_t-sBf7EKXQ3A=DTyy-Vc7M-ZK9-vfJxmw@mail.gmail.com> <6319292.vCqnBZbX7o@localhost> <CAHej_8nd1xyAgwASLJbuJHyXEAfHbjqxNH1XtJxKFyfyOneyug@mail.gmail.com> <13145172.pEV04Z3DvM@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <13145172.pEV04Z3DvM@localhost>
From: Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 16:20:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHej_8msLJQ0vbZ2jzitjxrQ1wdim5bHJkiD-QrU5F0EJvQp0g@mail.gmail.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000aa73ec05f7fb99fb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/SVUef0s3djOYNAayrFAfDsI8IQ0>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 20:21:15 -0000

On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 4:01 PM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

>
> "...MUST NOT deploy a DMARC policy other than p=none because use of
> p=reject
> or (to a slightly lesser extent) p=quarantine for such domains is
> extremely
> harmful to email interoperability.  Mitigation strategies are discussed in
> [RFC 7960] and [RFC 8617]."
>
> I don't think we need to reiterate what p=reject does here, that's
> extensively
> addressed elsewhere in the document.  I don't think we have enough data to
> opine either way about the effectiveness of such strategies, so it's
> enough to
> point at them here.  We don't currently list RFC 8617 as a reference.  I
> think
> introducing an informative reference here is useful.  It's experimental,
> so we
> definitely don't want to put any normative language around it.
>
> I suspect that's probably not what you would find ideal (it's not what I
> would
> find ideal either, but I can live with it).  Can you live with it?  What
> do
> others think?
>
>
In my estimation, the language you propose here establishes the primacy of
interoperability over the needs/wishes of the domain owner.

My preference is for language that acknowledges the primacy of the domain
owner over interoperability.

I don't have time tonight to propose alternative text, but I wanted to
acknowledge that I've read your message and make a promise to propose
alternative text tomorrow.

-- 

*Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem
*e:* todd.herr@valimail.com
*m:* 703.220.4153

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.