IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 29 March 2023 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC4EC13AE22 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 06:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ocaJNd_7poxA for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 06:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com (mail-ed1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEC00C13AE20 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 06:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id h8so63235037ede.8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 06:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680096332; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bblxUiZCCa+S2m71f2+Z9IWDGDZGvXmNPtA8fJUZrUY=; b=MK2eWB1vCIZyMBEeZhwk0e6h8nByE6RxqBZ/vcbrqDkABn4oBTUpDkX8jjrcUqyDKj iYf6A6gpd5kDoqeaPBPJdl0OjjM+kHzfbHk7LK90PchiuGV9UGOINMWBffHjgnh7oQMg 62KfGHO1capOHTEjfHODUlZ3hYxGqAw2217ryi4ypeYOUIhBHbT3dfRT1+nBNEcqgbzB xcP7oVK1wsfVKRfhDhGhw22R++ksY+lA18FVBXcWZK3d+HmPTOcfC+yrXo5aG7r+cSAA bz/NqlfJmz2y8c/MyziRck2XKeY/k6+9SIDs3OTz70Lm4Ycu1VRDOWTLny6IA0a0w+lH sebQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680096332; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=bblxUiZCCa+S2m71f2+Z9IWDGDZGvXmNPtA8fJUZrUY=; b=mfporMwA89zavKo8FRTkMjvZYSXEi/n8C+twtwef+W+5NhcyT9RDX0NQDHNvmhVuC7 H5SeCvPmf/JEKRGoQQ9jpf/A0m7IPiHyHQ+1pK1H1AeGsGd9B7WVaodl38iZ8PJZhbdK EMjXmijI3DBVxiybKQGHNlXyU50xK7g6jaA90tSxdn3zUIFxAHZN7GG/URPdTX+e87Yh efdJus5nJ+e1RiD6SjRY6aB6MdrRB59viYV1ztnS64tfv8FqUMsrt6x3vBtSkdFbKIa0 Gxbmen8KPdFUr1EJHOC1mu2zS+hi3WyJPAShSWKKZODwy6O8mYExhJd+k9hl7f8FjxfU Y3kw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9ddKcFjJpJJCYEG6j0Nv+ijV8okPCaYE0Iz8sVngh1gx2qQabfx pNgOIgc6H718dmTHYmnQc4ic1ugEqGSnST+e+aYOmPWmd2k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350bwCUnuCRGzmMS3jOIZa41lP8C6j7wyiI/gA4YzaXS4LMHrFw6yl/5yKbUmxy6aoy45zutoOVBKW3kNeHqldL0=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:72d4:b0:930:310:abef with SMTP id du20-20020a17090772d400b009300310abefmr1608730ejc.3.1680096332098; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 06:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJ+NBg9vzqa0_t-sBf7EKXQ3A=DTyy-Vc7M-ZK9-vfJxmw@mail.gmail.com> <d02bfc46-efd1-28db-c14a-5c1365aefcbb@tana.it> <CAH48ZfwhLE0bhG9aqUjkqBpGLTXj2NmdDR2F8aMeBGvOXVX7vw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH48ZfwhLE0bhG9aqUjkqBpGLTXj2NmdDR2F8aMeBGvOXVX7vw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 22:25:19 +0900
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwa+T-8A4x721ZrGvwhOwmTxSBxSxu5_-mTSGSCGjDEUAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Douglas Foster <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000102e1605f809e9a7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/EyplpGUXHy6JpVxUwRgMTU3hjCc>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 13:25:34 -0000

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 8:59 PM Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com> wrote:

> MUST seems to take us back to the unfinished debate of 3 years ago, where
> some asserted that DMARC did more harm than good and should only be used
> for transactional mail, which seemed to mean PayPal and not much else.
>

Have we concluded that DMARC (or "reject" in particular) is now appropriate
for use with non-transactional mail?

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email