Re: [Gendispatch] Ending [e-mail] <-- the dispatch question

[Rob Sayre <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 5:07 PM Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]> wrote:

> My position is still best summarised here:
>   https://mnot.github.io/I-D/discussion-recharter/


Ah, I've read this draft before, and I agree with what it says, as far as
it goes.

I'll think about combining this and R. Wilton's ideas.

thanks,
Rob




> > On 8 Apr 2021, at 4:23 am, Rob Sayre <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 6:41 AM Pete Resnick <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> > On 6 Apr 2021, at 19:23, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > I'd observe that last-call@ was introduced by the IESG after community
> consultation. Is that a potential path for dispatch -- i.e., saying "IESG,
> you might want to look at this..."?
> >
> > Yep, that's on the list in the charter:
> > - Requesting that the the IESG or the IETF LLC consider taking up the
> work.
> > Nonetheless, I think the IESG would appreciate a draft to look at.
> >
> >
> > I don't feel the need to drive here. If Mark wants to, that's fine with
> me. This problem seems to be a bit of a hot potato.
> >
> > But I'll put on my flame-retardant pants and write the I-D if necessary.
> :)
> >
> > thanks,
> > Rob
> >
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>