Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 10 June 2020 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E3A3A0C82 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=FWqjb8rx; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=pVr/i3GV
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kvXOB-BkEQeg for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D161C3A0C76 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC145EB; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:14:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:14:06 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm3; bh=C 2U9fC47X20Njy145Bq+pfMwv9a6sWST31ZTYwdJxzs=; b=FWqjb8rxvv0kC51Hj ywovYWcNaHylJrmbf1oxOag57AxGnrFCRINIOeO49znWFHt+XuyAnY0rOh0YW15I M3MKDPPXvj4GobxspDDw7vQEuO8ltYOfym4Xu2ZWlyuaG/ZGQJt+oaGfE7X2MWIY vnhpEfFc1czfx7mVYj6ZREhZggSLn+GqYayRM+b4xIy+2Cu05D02AXEfkLDZuHY+ w3o7xy8dDPfkREq4laxLWaSOaW3uswzWul7LSrJeFYPWXjn9NwzyNzf/FCXB3Gti BjfKQZ3tzJQPnw3IoUny0t0Flviqv2MLvVrJoREYAxcF2QuOTTdKvkF35AwbnbB3 bGWYQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=C2U9fC47X20Njy145Bq+pfMwv9a6sWST31ZTYwdJx zs=; b=pVr/i3GVHgrNgn+Z2PWN/G0aKjuZE+yX2yRrrGDRuBBMCFBmYKBlsftci 9rqtvuk6uu9X5V3aHQpxdedPHCyG3sMIF+hqkzPu+ErLJp4EFb2Gj+k7XC74CqSc jrGQMBvgdFR6eJtuSaZCO5CUq8YZTTp4FbVDRW5w2qu+MBLJALAtzYqVfGM21Z/Q ciKmvZ1dxfvAUWxO1oTSDUnN8JD2gF+XE0m0C6t2GmoGk61P7K8x1DYize9rBiY3 ZmeTorf/PxIQK4WoTm2ZA3dj6P7mfh5q9bBF/M4wcdCnQ2Slv1n+nh0jMn+5KLq8 b2oFqDvr43q8KPYcpMATniUbjTkqg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:3hThXi3TMcxfVIzG7muPpIC2uXn5-SzISr-3VWrU9CvQ7teH2xVOOQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudehiedguddufecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesth hqmhdthhdtjeenucfhrhhomheptehlihhsshgrucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrges tghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefguedtkeethfekleehheethe dvkeektedtvddvjefghfeikeffgeegveefueegtdenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdho rhhgnecukfhppedujeefrdefkedruddujedrkeejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:3hThXlF0Y7D2aQRME64OUmQbiQy886l0zlxLWzPqs43dSUo_b0yKiw> <xmx:3hThXq6k5eSSqfImZHHzoOY1wn-g8Ip90X1A-kMYowVkjG4Vo1gmtg> <xmx:3hThXj3eBsF25gDVbcSZ2va_JYsFCTRSZIVtjUf6vqWjjk8QhunKjg> <xmx:3hThXpSWZklxw-jyQEuU9IjEqsFMZ3sP0wp8swrNBo4vcvZ9Vz6PRA>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.87]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DD7CF3060FE7; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:14:05 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.5\))
Subject: Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <7512872f-478e-1564-1fa7-0e016a366b23@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:14:04 -0400
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <47DAD616-BF2B-42BD-B701-D1CD01359ED8@cooperw.in>
References: <159166311543.4506.736406779378278905@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAFgnS4WOjmNOf_MRfms1RD0e15xYP-xcfNiyqS7p5ofYBEQPdw@mail.gmail.com> <d65a8aeffc61b6d069afa87f3c91b10496c4d5b2.camel@lsl.digital> <5FCC8656386268B41681E1DE@PSB> <B4293B17-6F83-4B9E-89BF-C0B1388F346F@cable.comcast.com> <03db01d63f31$974076a0$c5c163e0$@olddog.co.uk> <2DA6CAB7-978C-44BC-ADF5-DA8C4CBBD9BA@cooperw.in> <7512872f-478e-1564-1fa7-0e016a366b23@joelhalpern.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0dnvPZgdHuRIiB_fzM3GTKB8eCs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:14:10 -0000

> On Jun 10, 2020, at 10:49 AM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
> 
> Does the Remote participants count on the individual meetings registration page include or exclude people who were also in-person attendees?

The numbers on that page actually show the number of remote registrants, not the number of remote participants. So “attendees” on that page is a misnomer.

Detailed stats about remote participation are available at <https://www.ietf.org/media/documents/ietf-remote-participation-99-106.pdf> (which is linked from <https://www.ietf.org/about/administration/reports/>). You can see there are big differences between the number of people who register for remote participation and the number of people who actually attend remotely. These numbers exclude people who attended both on-site and remotely at the same meeting.

Alissa

> 
> Thank you,
> Joel
> 
> On 6/10/2020 10:41 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>>> On Jun 10, 2020, at 10:15 AM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> FWIW, there is an IETF LLC board meeting later this week (feel
>>>> free to attend). I have asked for an update at that time during
>>>> the public part on the number of IETF-108 registrations as well
>>>> as the number of waiver applications.
>>> 
>>> Thanks, Jason. I believe that is appropriate information to have your hands on.
>>> 
>>> I think it would also be worth having a look at the remote registrations for the last three (physical) IETF meetings.
>> All of these numbers are available at <https://ietf.org/how/meetings/past/>.
>> Alissa
>>> I have a vague memory of the numbers for IETF-106 being upward of 600 with both IETF-105 and IETF-104 being above 800. But it is important to consider not just a bare count of how many people registered as remote attendees, but also the geographical make-up.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Adrian
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Ietf108planning mailing list
>>> Ietf108planning@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf108planning