Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108

[Alissa Cooper <[e-mail]>]

> On Jun 10, 2020, at 10:49 AM, Joel M. Halpern <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Does the Remote participants count on the individual meetings registration page include or exclude people who were also in-person attendees?

The numbers on that page actually show the number of remote registrants, not the number of remote participants. So “attendees” on that page is a misnomer.

Detailed stats about remote participation are available at <https://www.ietf.org/media/documents/ietf-remote-participation-99-106.pdf> (which is linked from <https://www.ietf.org/about/administration/reports/>). You can see there are big differences between the number of people who register for remote participation and the number of people who actually attend remotely. These numbers exclude people who attended both on-site and remotely at the same meeting.

Alissa

> 
> Thank you,
> Joel
> 
> On 6/10/2020 10:41 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>>> On Jun 10, 2020, at 10:15 AM, Adrian Farrel <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> FWIW, there is an IETF LLC board meeting later this week (feel
>>>> free to attend). I have asked for an update at that time during
>>>> the public part on the number of IETF-108 registrations as well
>>>> as the number of waiver applications.
>>> 
>>> Thanks, Jason. I believe that is appropriate information to have your hands on.
>>> 
>>> I think it would also be worth having a look at the remote registrations for the last three (physical) IETF meetings.
>> All of these numbers are available at <https://ietf.org/how/meetings/past/>.
>> Alissa
>>> I have a vague memory of the numbers for IETF-106 being upward of 600 with both IETF-105 and IETF-104 being above 800. But it is important to consider not just a bare count of how many people registered as remote attendees, but also the geographical make-up.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Adrian
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Ietf108planning mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf108planning