Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108

Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> Thu, 11 June 2020 09:34 UTC

Return-Path: <jay@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8CB3A179A; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 02:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1ZJAC7mT6snT; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 02:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.49] (unknown [158.140.230.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 294E33A1795; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 02:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-ECD04E92-A878-4856-A693-349240BD0E5C
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 21:34:35 +1200
Message-Id: <5DE19E46-9DEA-4E93-80DD-A3C076B072DC@ietf.org>
References: <98B3DAEE-F9B7-47C1-AE0E-4559D1572740@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, "ietf108planning@ietf.org" <ietf108planning@ietf.org>, "exec-director@ietf.org" <exec-director@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <98B3DAEE-F9B7-47C1-AE0E-4559D1572740@gmail.com>
To: Tim Chown <tjc.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (17E262)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/sVlPS8s3D78RxDgygHg_7wA3328>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:34:39 -0000

Tim

> On 11/06/2020, at 9:03 PM, Tim Chown <tjc.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I can see both points of view, but it would help to understand the rationale for the fee if there were some data published - and maybe I missed it - on the administrative cost of running a wholly online IETF meeting.  And whether that fee is covering purely those, or a share of the year on year administrative costs for the IETF.

Answers in this blog post

	https://www.ietf.org/blog/ietf108-registration-fees/

Jay
-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director