IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Registration open for IETF 108

Ish Sookun <ish@lsl.digital> Wed, 10 June 2020 16:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ish@lsl.digital>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7113A0B60 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lsl.digital
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M6msaEp6poPx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from za-smtp-delivery-137.mimecast.co.za (za-smtp-delivery-137.mimecast.co.za [41.74.201.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1CB03A0A93 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lsl.digital; s=mimecast20200520; t=1591806036; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=t2BunDX6joLh+2+WOcbtir8DYUfR1nfVtYD82vmon90=; b=Tyynikl+zpbJ2jgL7ZHKSbRa2YgzFoq70TYZxE9ZqFOMGK7/yuhQHhyDx1qq7gBPbBRq5E sgRI9LT+m3xI9RmBpt5CAEai0miGQ6k7KzB/cap4o11a9+INP1+8mJ155Xws/hr6/z0N2P dPo8Db78OMHfLABO1GKjkzfrgDtuyg0=
Received: from mx-1.lasentinelle.mu (mx-1.lasentinelle.mu [88.198.224.209]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id za-mta-131-1tt1x7NeNdCDC_5TspM7Ww-1; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:20:35 +0200
X-MC-Unique: 1tt1x7NeNdCDC_5TspM7Ww-1
Received: from mx-1.lasentinelle.mu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx-1.lasentinelle.mu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49hsfS2tKDz5mKs; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:20:32 +0400 (+04)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx-1.lasentinelle.mu
Received: from mx-1.lasentinelle.mu ([127.0.0.1]) by mx-1.lasentinelle.mu (mx-1.lasentinelle.mu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Z06Bfw-VAeJl; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:20:32 +0400 (+04)
Received: from [192.168.100.6] (unknown [102.119.213.231]) by mx-1.lasentinelle.mu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49hsfP1YsPz5mJk; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:20:28 +0400 (+04)
Message-ID: <1183321e9bf3e130701eef2aa24c1d7b5b392404.camel@lsl.digital>
Subject: Re: Registration open for IETF 108
From: Ish Sookun <ish@lsl.digital>
To: Mary B <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>, "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, "ietf108planning@ietf.org" <ietf108planning@ietf.org>, "exec-director@ietf.org" <exec-director@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:20:25 +0400
In-Reply-To: <CABmDk8=gxXiQ60hpdCNB6jK0EG_ssAQnzjgJp=c9yXNKabHKeA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <159166311543.4506.736406779378278905@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAFgnS4WOjmNOf_MRfms1RD0e15xYP-xcfNiyqS7p5ofYBEQPdw@mail.gmail.com> <d65a8aeffc61b6d069afa87f3c91b10496c4d5b2.camel@lsl.digital> <5FCC8656386268B41681E1DE@PSB> <B4293B17-6F83-4B9E-89BF-C0B1388F346F@cable.comcast.com> <CABmDk8=gxXiQ60hpdCNB6jK0EG_ssAQnzjgJp=c9yXNKabHKeA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.3 (by Flathub.org)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: lsl.digital
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/b26xrm5Mhm6GYEsIEjaQFcG2cUo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 16:20:57 -0000

Hi Mary,

On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 09:28 -0500, Mary B wrote:
> [..]  So, I really think it should be truly need based (or at least
> half the pool in that category).  It is worded somewhat that way on
> the registration form, but the email announcement wasn't as
> specific.   I know you have some demographics from surveys but I'm
> guessing probably not enough to really know how many remote attendees
> might end up in that pool.

I quote from the registration [1] form:

    « The IETF provides fee waivers for the IETF 108 meeting to support
      those for whom the registration fee represents a barrier to
      participation. Please respect this and only request a fee waiver 
      if that applies to you. »

Without a proper assessment of this "barrier to participation" the 100
attendees quota can easily fill up.

Regards,

Ish Sookun

[1] https://www.ietf.org/how/meetings/108/108-registration-fee-waiver/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email