IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108

Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> Thu, 11 June 2020 01:52 UTC

Return-Path: <jay@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C333A1629; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RSNxSe6PMw2D; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from macbook-pro.localdomain (unknown [158.140.230.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30CB73A1626; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <EF35B376-AB50-48ED-BB0C-54B2EFE94ABD@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B2CA14FF-E8C4-4C78-83B7-DEA1009CF357"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:51:56 +1200
In-Reply-To: <D6C86F61-7AD7-4570-840D-DCE01D1FC32D@me.com>
Cc: "John R. Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>, ietf@ietf.org, csp@csperkins.org
To: Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen=40me.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <20200611011728.9AC071A5EFB6@ary.qy> <D6C86F61-7AD7-4570-840D-DCE01D1FC32D@me.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_A1RbDfUhYhzZhfew0icXlISco0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 01:52:02 -0000


> On 11/06/2020, at 1:48 PM, Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen=40me.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> John,
> 
> I am not arguing that the business models are the same or that the IETF can
> make “everything free” in the long run. I am arguing (as have others), that the
> fee change happened rather quickly with not much community discussion or consensus.
> 
> This would be an excellent time IMO to ask ISOC for additional support while we
> figure out the longer term strategy.
> 
> With respect to the actual meeting income for f2f meetings, my understanding is that
> these come from both (usually) a major sponsor (called “The Host”) and of course the
> registration fees. This goes into paying for everything on site, ++ RPC etc.
> 
> The expenses are clearly going to be different for online-only meeting.

They are indeed and there is a blog post with the details here:

	https://www.ietf.org/blog/ietf108-registration-fees/ <https://www.ietf.org/blog/ietf108-registration-fees/>

Jay

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
jay@ietf.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email