Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108

[Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]>]

*rotfl*
At the risk of getting banned from Bremen for life:

a) How many hundreds of years ago was this model retired in Bremen ?
b) How many decades is Bremen now the poorest state in Germany
   living from subsidies by other states ?

Having said this: I would love for IETF to use this model and
think i have said so on this list in before. I think it does
work well when there is sufficient financial responsibilities
on all sides and i am quite confident this is the case for
IETF.

Cheers
    Toerless

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 02:06:47AM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On 2020-06-11, at 21:12, Michael Thomas <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > 
> > Not to be a wet blanket but what happens if corpro bean counters find out that they can game the system for the cost of a checkbox?
> 
> The city of Bremen historically had a taxation system that worked like this:
> 
> (1) pay whatever you want
> (2) it will be public what you paid
> 
> Grüße, Carsten

-- 
---
[e-mail]