IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 11 June 2020 20:30 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827CD3A0823 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=eJBSJtZ5; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=gt6iIXJ3
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wDd2CfLYwZCL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C44643A0819 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 99014 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2020 20:30:38 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=182c4.5ee2946e.k2006; bh=LpO8TsgK/YPM4tww5+7niBQbGNFLOpgIY0+X6RwBjD0=; b=eJBSJtZ5qXgXPZgFngp5T6NiOtIHdNpMVoc3Fw+NmzbvFrvJiKziG7RCDQGWEJzIw0it+RfQ+edGTSthihcwK8or6K2OFgUoMsHREszsEqKIYdq0k5MEOxLf+40bIq1172jNx2oZLvg8Y0yKkBUlDOIq31nxVvfm9pSZVxQCxbvpiyBZU7mC8H/kM09/f9mS/VBdqkE68IIKVZ3GqJOiaOHvZ5OgR/yxYoVI4csFi+mjxJaTWXcjBHHm277Owqqj
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=182c4.5ee2946e.k2006; bh=LpO8TsgK/YPM4tww5+7niBQbGNFLOpgIY0+X6RwBjD0=; b=gt6iIXJ30v9OVvRWNfooI9zor5GIT585KYGbJqj3aygOBCyikWLktT6kaVXkmIFqauYzkjqxgIzKMTrcpOKRNUJuKnCDEl5ehYsuTcw34VeVHzgNCqpQiIb5zIbbjmFBox1ZV5/DDx4qTmOTTJemWNRjBm3NBLEmDlK6zGL2C61M98jNTkLU8B3gbbti581hCS2Rn3saornXUYXS9FfGlbeA0ZC+3givfFATWeMlLrwe3PsG6+WJuSr1SLkVrLja
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 11 Jun 2020 20:30:38 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id DBD3B1A665F6; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 16:30:39 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 16:30:39 -0400
Message-Id: <20200611203039.DBD3B1A665F6@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108
In-Reply-To: <71021dea-5bf0-ac05-f9d7-cc7396540767@mtcc.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/RrHfWdbgWbYe4ECZ8EuG6jZRIco>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 20:30:42 -0000

In article <71021dea-5bf0-ac05-f9d7-cc7396540767@mtcc.com> you write:
>Not to be a wet blanket but what happens if corpro bean counters find 
>out that they can game the system for the cost of a checkbox?

I think we should burn that bridge if and when we get to it.

For decades it's been an open secret that anyone can walk into a
meeting session without a badge, yet whenever I looked around,
everyone I saw had a badge.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email