Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108

Melinda Shore <> Tue, 09 June 2020 21:41 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF113A0930 for <>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u0pfHwOPrrcZ for <>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 645F53A092F for <>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id b16so126391pfi.13 for <>; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I4XSti+U0bI6wscXeL9HruH0804Sq8FI7VzjOJYbE4c=; b=Bw3yzoheltTqv24auHi2on+ht5B21F8t6q2tWLbZLi0j9MrAmNO51VAlVN2b7ocm+d 9xpw3j30Y/LMp5BGVcH17zYqIxX0UzMgrRNTf55cbCvmBTGrd3ZYo9dHERtgdmacMWFt 8c8umlEwSXDgMfAzFGRWH6pWwzCxRFJ+Wbkir2W2Vt1p7WPMDwwrjbRUeO0waYwrb5rI KPyiSyiilZp4L6DH/SQTokH9xNSMui2QNquw3eVor/EUuojiH6xovVkbGhNk9mcxcLFK MNowk2y+OwN4DsY1Xd7E+TeeRONzdWllrcs5z2hfo4v1gJ6Lz5pkGwdqGZ1oDGBJc4OH YU9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=I4XSti+U0bI6wscXeL9HruH0804Sq8FI7VzjOJYbE4c=; b=Hrf1XT/h8pZ5+ELhBkDuBaUHut0p/Isk1Qg7tWerBGrJx8Kp7R3vejoKpBjbQiJU5f fGUJolAvxISC6fnFoCd9h8dbUFBrYTUZ/DoBMN1nGLExVYEiWXkZ9wjpvSQXDDFjm01h NDgGOaCEjQ/0YiPx4ukc/erix2pXt/93FifB1TyOERgwDEME4BDmT5XDDMNtS6pIhr8G BYnt5o57ajgkB2JAlI2RElncbs+tWVNC1obv+NOaXuAeh5cqfbV+MwwQwSP+C2WMWQzi YLtUyA/Bfoujhhud46hV8OcaFnUCBUVbWpHuqvQHHL4Do+xfFDIfq586DtehdUBbHKfF 34vA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530LDoyccKqJPCjn3e2LKCHQSik82vXN4IRbXByMInxQW7B766iz EV/zER7/gTO68iqSAt6wxfnD5hc9
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYggc9I4IDzC+uFUzoXy/XyN51nHNZrYIfZgLLARQkAkNMa8zXQsIqVGnR78f/7mus91sQNg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:cc0f:: with SMTP id x15mr51668pgf.84.1591738868243; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aspen.local ([]) by with ESMTPSA id q193sm11028088pfq.158.2020. for <> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108
References: <> <> <>
From: Melinda Shore <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:41:05 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 21:41:11 -0000

On 6/9/20 1:33 PM, Jay Daley wrote:
> It was discussed yes and we felt that adding one more special fee
> without considering all of the other factors affecting affordability was
> inappropriate, and that doing that should be part of a community process
> to provide us with guidance.

I apologize if this seems like piling-on but I agree with Stephen
that this is all becoming a bit problematic.  Why do you need a
community process for providing discounted registration fees but
not for changes to the IPR policy and to the institution of a
fee for remote participation?


Melinda Shore

Software longa, hardware brevis