Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108

"Bajpai, Vaibhav" <vaibhav.bajpai@tum.de> Wed, 10 June 2020 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <vaibhav.bajpai@tum.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C03B3A08D6; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tum.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UTmLlK6XVhYx; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de (postout2.mail.lrz.de [IPv6:2001:4ca0:0:103::81bb:ff8a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 423493A08CB; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49hpyZ2h51zyWT; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 16:19:18 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: postout.lrz.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=tum.de
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tum.de; h= mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id:content-type :content-type:content-language:accept-language:in-reply-to :references:message-id:date:date:subject:subject:from:from :received:received:received:received; s=postout; t=1591798758; bh=7DVCtP6i7orsBtPEbh7B4bdSvWUrq7N20NzoQWBJY2g=; b=KyQsI8y+bGQL ltLrgOtKM4q8zId8g+w7miLRoPcsjYTNqNoxXaXXt5OdFkV9oBYIvqOSucsQBUKD muBGHaEgje7Z/y8WDuqgOyK2r5zwWbw/I7bKbnn/c65zlviDL4GJhckqJ8qQ/+Wm h5mDH6s1M4XAZnNlF5zeDVZFn4ZWNMvhX+aSzX7NWZhkqAmM4WbLSkg8ruOHOmUM HkzxNHzp/gZTscwims6GxWcsdXjtfEDscwzi/Rqvw52euTMnYI8ciOKkZQsQPVQK Z6yAMrPDR5RxNV9a/uaB16zCEGZDB7wVi6P9DXeE3x1ZCSIal7iwcJf21xLSaX7q GTZbf5jf7w==
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lrz.de in lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de
Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de (lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 20024) with LMTP id 4VJexQCvgk-v; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 16:19:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from BADWLRZ-SWMBX10.ads.mwn.de (BADWLRZ-SWMBX10.ads.mwn.de [IPv6:2001:4ca0:0:108::166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "BADWLRZ-SWMBX10", Issuer "BADWLRZ-SWMBX10" (not verified)) by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49hpyZ0nXyzyRl; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 16:19:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from BADWLRZ-SWMBX11.ads.mwn.de (2001:4ca0:0:108::167) by BADWLRZ-SWMBX10.ads.mwn.de (2001:4ca0:0:108::166) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 16:19:13 +0200
Received: from BADWLRZ-SWMBX11.ads.mwn.de ([fe80::f0dd:745f:a1b4:5014]) by BADWLRZ-SWMBX11.ads.mwn.de ([fe80::f0dd:745f:a1b4:5014%13]) with mapi id 15.01.1979.003; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 16:19:13 +0200
From: "Bajpai, Vaibhav" <vaibhav.bajpai@tum.de>
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
CC: "Bajpai, Vaibhav" <vaibhav.bajpai@tum.de>, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108
Thread-Topic: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108
Thread-Index: AQHWPfaYzaCtrcaOekKYtgeYOrH1aqjQjhkAgAAfqYCAAAIkgIAAKpsAgADsRAA=
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:19:13 +0000
Message-ID: <8e59b4e9-ae1a-451b-b2ba-972a547a7a40@BADWLRZ-SWMBX10.ads.mwn.de>
References: <159166311543.4506.736406779378278905@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAFgnS4WOjmNOf_MRfms1RD0e15xYP-xcfNiyqS7p5ofYBEQPdw@mail.gmail.com> <A0FFB0DF-CBBD-48D0-A693-32CB2F4253A2@ietf.org> <d2082b2c-6829-9c89-1d13-5a220f0818fc@gmail.com> <3BB04CD0-9D32-49BA-A360-2DE0C500B6C8@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <3BB04CD0-9D32-49BA-A360-2DE0C500B6C8@ietf.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthMechanism: 04
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: BADWLRZ-SWMBX11.ads.mwn.de
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [178.11.238.118]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <5731662C4BEA7441B8E3D904E70DD726@ads.mwn.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/jUy3BZo4okOaYITuHn--k4DuwK8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:19:26 -0000

Hi,

> On 10. Jun 2020, at 02:13, Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> That’s one way of interpreting it.  The other is that we have always charged
> an in-person meeting fee and now that the entire meeting has moved online, the
> fee has moved online with it and where previously we had a special mechanism
> of remote participation for certain groups of people, we now have a special
> mechanism of fee waivers targeted at those who are most affected.

Remote participations were not capped when physical meetings were possible 
IIRC, while fee waivers are now capped to 100 with the new online mode. This 
leaves an impression that the IETF is now less inclusive than it used to be.

— Vaibhav

------------------------------
Vaibhav Bajpai, www.vaibhavbajpai.com